Should results show the description vs url field?

[mitechie]

This is kind of a question. It takes some parsing when looking at the urls and I wonder if the descriptions would be nice to use in the lists.

[DerekV]

My thinking is that description should be shown, or it should be configurable.

[DerekV]

Opened issue #5 , which is related. I see this as more of a question of what should the list view itself look like/display ...

• where is the sweet spot between ...
  ** displaying more information
  ** being easier to read (less dense)
  ** having more bookmarks fit on the screen.
• how do we decide what information to leave off (and provide in some sort of details or zoomed view ( ala issue #5 )

[widox]

Hm, I think just showing the bmark title; and the tags (maybe a good candidate for config option) would be good. Then maybe a long press could show the more detailed info. i.e. date saved, url, etc.

Additionally, I like having favicons for each bmark; makes it easier to parse and recognize bmarks. This is especially helpful when mobile.

[DerekV]

Thanks widox. Regarding the favicons, agreed and opening a new issue #6

[mitechie]

I've put some thought into it and I think mirroring the UI in the web 'mobile' view would be good. It shows the tags, description, username, and controls in a three line format. I have always like the twitter swipe for controls UX though so perhaps just showing tags and description would be a good start at seeing info and that the username/controls would be some for a 'click on the row to view details' activity.