Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve support for parameter-dependent return types of functions generated by preprocessor macros #73

Conversation

@CromwellEnage
Copy link
Collaborator

commented Feb 2, 2019

The code generation macros are supposed to support parameter-dependent return types, but it turns out that they currently don't really do that. This commit fixes the issue.

Improve support for parameter-dependent return types of functions gen…
…erated by preprocessor macros

The code generation macros are supposed to support parameter-dependent return types, but it turns out that they currently don't really do that.  This commit fixes the issue.
@eldiener

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Collaborator

commented Feb 4, 2019

I do not see any logical reason why you would specify any #include statement in two lines rather than one. Please do not obfuscate the code in this way. It looks completely unnecessary to me.

@eldiener eldiener merged commit 9f778f0 into boostorg:develop Feb 4, 2019

2 checks passed

continuous-integration/appveyor/pr AppVeyor build succeeded
Details
continuous-integration/travis-ci/pr The Travis CI build passed
Details

@CromwellEnage CromwellEnage deleted the CromwellEnage:feature_parameter_dependent_return_types branch Feb 4, 2019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.