From af8be96595980c0f17ef84b9f965f75cc42bcd60 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Beck <beck.ct@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 07:55:34 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] adjust a code comment in offset_based_getter

---
 include/boost/pfr/detail/offset_based_getter.hpp | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/boost/pfr/detail/offset_based_getter.hpp b/include/boost/pfr/detail/offset_based_getter.hpp
index 200139a4..4b71e1ec 100644
--- a/include/boost/pfr/detail/offset_based_getter.hpp
+++ b/include/boost/pfr/detail/offset_based_getter.hpp
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@ class offset_based_getter {
   template <std::size_t idx>
   static std::ptrdiff_t offset() {
     constexpr tuple_of_aligned_storage_t<S> layout{};
-    // TODO: Do modern compilers optimize `layout` object out of the binary?
+    // TODO: Do all targetted compilers optimize `layout` object out of the binary? (gcc and clang seem to do so)
     // Ideally this pointer diff reduces to a constant and this call gets inlined.
     // But since we are doing reinterpret cast, I don't think we can use `constexpr` to ensure that.
     //