RFC: [b-table, b-table-lite]: should a row with row-details showing use
aria-details instead of
When a screen reader encounters
This would probably need to be tested with multiple screen readers on multiple browsers to see if they pick only one of the two attributes.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I agree in changing
I'm not aware how good aria-details support is and how it exactly behaves. I would want to see it in action to get more feel for it once we can test it out. If I understand correctly,
If I just go off my current understanding for it, I'm hesitant on adding both of them at the same time just so we can have a fallback because modal would behave differently(reading the content or not) depending if it is supported or not.
If some users want their modal content to be read on focus and use
I'm agree that changing
About adding both
I feel like giving the users the choice to be able to hear more detail on something is better for everyone in the end. Have you considered keeping
@briandhill from the WAI ARIA spec, if both
aria-details rather than
aria-describedby when details row showing (addresses #3801)