-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add citation file #76
Conversation
So the issue with Github's CITATION.cff is, it generates a BibTex but it's quite broken in a sense that it messes up the authors names. For example, for the
Now, we can either use this or go with creating our own BibTex (with So, what's your opinion on this? @pcuenca @borisdayma |
@khalidsaifullaah what's wrong with that BibTex? I just wanted to test what the new official citation support looked like. The nice thing about it is that it appears in a dedicated section, so I suppose it would be harder to ignore. But I don't particularly care for this too much anyway, so if you think another method is better we can close this one. |
Yeah, I also think using this recent feature is a good idea, most of the users will start using it from now on. The |
That |
Oh, I see, thanks for your insight @lkhphuc! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we can go ahead with this option after making those minimal changes...
- "zero-shot" | ||
- JAX | ||
license: "Apache-2.0" | ||
message: "If you use this software, please cite it using these metadata." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you just include the DOI that @borisdayma has generated for our repo, you can just add it here by the following:
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1234
- "zero-shot" | ||
- JAX | ||
license: "Apache-2.0" | ||
message: "If you use this software, please cite it using these metadata." |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we say here Project
or DALL·E Mini
or something else instead of software
?
Or we must use the software
term here...?
As suggested by Khalid