Add citation file

[pcuenca]

As suggested by Khalid

[khalidsaifullaah]

So the issue with Github's CITATION.cff is, it generates a BibTex but it's quite broken in a sense that it messes up the authors names. For example, for the .cff above, we get a BibTex as the following:

@misc{Dayma_DALL·E_Mini_2021,
author = {Dayma, Boris and Patil, Suraj and Cuenca, Pedro and Saifullah, Khalid and Abraham, Tanishq and Lê Khắc, Phúc and Melas, Luke and Ghosh, Ritobrata},
month = {7},
title = {DALL·E Mini},
url = {https://github.com/borisdayma/dalle-mini},
year = {2021}
}

Now, we can either use this or go with creating our own BibTex (with zenodo maybe) and add it in our repo's README (seems like almost all repos do it that way).

So, what's your opinion on this? @pcuenca @borisdayma

[pcuenca]

@khalidsaifullaah what's wrong with that BibTex?

I just wanted to test what the new official citation support looked like. The nice thing about it is that it appears in a dedicated section, so I suppose it would be harder to ignore. But I don't particularly care for this too much anyway, so if you think another method is better we can close this one.

[khalidsaifullaah]

Yeah, I also think using this recent feature is a good idea, most of the users will start using it from now on. The , in the wrong places of author section are what makes the BibTex are a bit weird. But if we use our own generated BibTex, in that case, we won't be able to use this GitHub feature, which is a bummer. So, whatever you guys think, but I'm thinking let's just use this BibTex the way it is, maybe it's not that big of a deal.

[lkhphuc]

That Dayma, Boris and Last, First name and ... is actually the correct format @khalidsaifullaah . The final output in the paper will be determine by the specific paper template.

[khalidsaifullaah]

Oh, I see, thanks for your insight @lkhphuc!
I and Boris were stressing over this naming format, but if it's the right format then I guess we can go ahead with this option!

[khalidsaifullaah]

I think we can go ahead with this option after making those minimal changes...

[khalidsaifullaah]

Could you just include the DOI that @borisdayma has generated for our repo, you can just add it here by the following:
doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1234

[khalidsaifullaah]

Can we say here Project or DALL·E Mini or something else instead of software?
Or we must use the software term here...?