This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 4, 2024. It is now read-only.
Rename working branch for squash merge #933
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The working branch used to create the squash merge commit should not be tested by the CI system. https://bors.tech/documentation/getting-started/ states: > Your CI system should build the “staging” and “trying” branches, but should not build the “staging.tmp” and “trying.tmp” branches. Suffixing with `.tmp` facilitate exclude by pattern: `*.tmp`.
|
Build succeeded: |
Closed
7 tasks
bors bot
pushed a commit
to leanprover-community/mathlib
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 17, 2020
Two hours ago, bors renamed the temporary branches. bors-ng/bors-ng#933 🙄
notriddle
added a commit
to bors-ng/bors-ng.github.io
that referenced
this pull request
May 2, 2020
Add @francoisfreitag as new contributor Add bors-ng/bors-ng#920 Add bors-ng/bors-ng#923 Add bors-ng/bors-ng#924 Add bors-ng/bors-ng#925 Add bors-ng/bors-ng#933 Add @gebner to new contributors Add bors-ng/bors-ng#928 Add bors-ng/bors-ng#929 Add bors-ng/bors-ng#930 Add @cryslith Add bors-ng/bors-ng#935 Add bors-ng/bors-ng#939 Add bors-ng/bors-ng#940 Add bors-ng/bors-ng#944
anrddh
pushed a commit
to anrddh/mathlib
that referenced
this pull request
May 15, 2020
) Two hours ago, bors renamed the temporary branches. bors-ng/bors-ng#933 🙄
anrddh
pushed a commit
to anrddh/mathlib
that referenced
this pull request
May 16, 2020
) Two hours ago, bors renamed the temporary branches. bors-ng/bors-ng#933 🙄
bors bot
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 19, 2020
1005: Unique list of reviewers for multiple code changes #933 r=notriddle a=ucwaldo This is a simple attempt to fix #993 While checking the `parse_owners.ex` file, i realized that it returns one reviewer per changed file even when all changes belong to the same codeowners. To be honest, I did not dig very deep and it could be that this happens somewhere later in the pipeline already and i just missed it. If that's the wrong approach because approvals are indeed tracked per file, i am happy to give it another go, ideally with some directions Co-authored-by: Theo Fiedler <theodor.fiedler@xing.com>
cipher1024
pushed a commit
to cipher1024/mathlib
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2022
) Two hours ago, bors renamed the temporary branches. bors-ng/bors-ng#933 🙄
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The working branch used to create the squash merge commit should not be
tested by the CI system.
https://bors.tech/documentation/getting-started/ states:
Suffixing with
.tmpfacilitate exclude by pattern:*.tmp.