New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Meta ticket] Roadmap for migrating diagnostics to ROS 2 #1
Comments
That sounds great. I don't really have an opinion on the porting order. |
@Karsten1987 I would offer to help with the migration. However, as I am probably much slower than you are, I should probably focus on an isolated package to avoid slowing you down. Both, |
Regarding the migration of bond: We should first analyze the liveliness mechanisms provided by DDS (cf. Section 2.2.3.11 of the DDS standard v1.4, which is available at https://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?formal/15-04-10.pdf). |
@ralph-lange where I actually agree with the liveliness I am somewhat unhappy with relying on DDS only features in high level packages. Generally, I still feel that ROS2 should stay DDS agnostic and therefore possibly support different middleware types. @norro Given Ralph's comment, I would support the idea that you guys have a look at the liveliness or DDS features which could be used and make a judgement call on the |
I recently started migration of the |
Migration of C++ API done, see ros/diagnostics@ros2-devel...boschresearch:ros2_migrate_diagnostic_aggregator. |
Migration of larger python parts is blocked as bondpy is not yet ported to ros2, see discussion in ros/bond_core#43 |
Meta Ticket tracking the progress of migrating diagnostics to ros2:
We propose the following next PRs:
We do not plan to port diagnostic_analysis.
Questions:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: