older ERTS compatibility + minor internal refactoring #3

wants to merge 4 commits into from

3 participants


external interface and behavior unchanged, except for (afaik) all statistics being keyed on atoms instead of strings


that seems like a really good idea to use atoms instead of strings

@joewilliams joewilliams was assigned Aug 10, 2012


Should address the concerns of this PR but is compatible with current folsom.

@joewilliams joewilliams closed this Nov 4, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment