older ERTS compatibility + minor internal refactoring #3

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

3 participants

@amtal

external interface and behavior unchanged, except for (afaik) all statistics being keyed on atoms instead of strings

@gebi

that seems like a really good idea to use atoms instead of strings

@joewilliams joewilliams was assigned Aug 10, 2012
@joewilliams

d0c1241
ade45c8
ffc18d2

Should address the concerns of this PR but is compatible with current folsom.

@joewilliams joewilliams closed this Nov 4, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment