Skip to content

Added SiteDiff to development environment: #72

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 3, 2023

Conversation

samlikins
Copy link
Member

When working on the site, it can be helpful to see changes between the production copy and the output of local changes. I've included the necessary components to utilize SiteDiff with a dedicated Docker services and BPKG commands. Documentation has been provided in the README.

  • Added Docker service for SiteDiff
  • Added configuration for SiteDiff to dedicated dev directory
  • Moved Dockerfile for Jekyll service to dedicated dev directory
  • Added BPKG commands for SiteDiff processes
  • Updated GIT ignore to handle SiteDiff runtime files
  • Updated README for SiteDiff processes
  • Updated README for missing LESSC command

- Added Docker service for SiteDiff
- Added configuration for SiteDiff to dedicated `dev` directory
- Moved `Dockerfile` for Jekyll service to dedicated `dev` directory
- Added BPKG commands for SiteDiff processes
- Updated GIT ignore to handle SiteDiff runtime files
- Updated README for SiteDiff processes
- Updated README for missing LESSC command
@samlikins samlikins requested review from Potherca and jwerle April 3, 2023 12:59
@samlikins
Copy link
Member Author

This development tool is directly related to the last changes to the site and for future modifications to come.

Copy link
Member

@Potherca Potherca left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was not familiar with SiteDiff, looks like something rather useful.

Anyway, LGTM. 👍

@samlikins samlikins merged commit ed3af15 into bpkg:master Apr 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants