diff --git a/_posts/2014-01-14-state-of-function-decompilation-in-javascript.md b/_posts/2014-01-14-state-of-function-decompilation-in-javascript.md
index 8ab8cc6..5a86710 100644
--- a/_posts/2014-01-14-state-of-function-decompilation-in-javascript.md
+++ b/_posts/2014-01-14-state-of-function-decompilation-in-javascript.md
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ Aha. So instead of passing them as strings or vars or whatever, they're defined
 
 The kind that we used in Prototype.js [to implement $super](http://prototypejs.org/2007/08/15/prototype-1-6-0-release-candidate/) back in 2007? Yep, that one. Later making its way to Resig's [simple inheritance](http://ejohn.org/blog/simple-javascript-inheritance/) (used in a _safe_ fashion) and other places.
 
-Seeing modern framework like Angular use function decompilation got me surprised. Even though it wasn't something Angular relied on _exclusively_, this black magic has been somewhat frown upon for years. I [wrote about some of the problems](http://perfectionkills.com/those-tricky-functions/) associated with it back in 2009.
+Seeing a modern framework like Angular use function decompilation got me surprised. Even though it wasn't something Angular relied on _exclusively_, this black magic has been somewhat frown upon for years. I [wrote about some of the problems](http://perfectionkills.com/those-tricky-functions/) associated with it back in 2009.
 
 Something so **inherently non-standard** and so **varying among implementations** could only be compared to user agent sniffing.