Consider support/handling of System.Net.ClientWebSocket #780

Closed
DaniilVeriga opened this Issue Dec 22, 2015 · 1 comment

Projects

None yet

3 participants

@DaniilVeriga
Contributor
DaniilVeriga commented Dec 22, 2015 edited

http://forums.bridge.net/forum/general/open-discussions/1320

Some basic support for System.Net would be helpful along with System.Net.WebSockets

For System.NET I am mainly missing the URI class. I think the ClientWebSocket class can simply wrap the built in browser WebSocket as it doesn't implement non-async members.

Relates to #776.

Implementation details:
MSDN ClientWebSocket Class

Underlying implementation according to MDN WebSockets

Includes a basic implemetation of System.Uri class

@DaniilVeriga DaniilVeriga modified the milestone: 1.12 Mar 7, 2016
@LeonidVeriga LeonidVeriga added this to the 1.14 milestone Jun 4, 2016
@LeonidVeriga LeonidVeriga closed this in #1048 Jun 4, 2016
@LeonidVeriga
Contributor
LeonidVeriga commented Jun 4, 2016 edited

MSDN ClientWebSocket Class

Underlying implementation according to MDN WebSockets

@LeonidVeriga LeonidVeriga changed the title from Consider support/handling of System.Net to Consider support/handling of System.Net.ClientWebSocket Jun 4, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment