We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A bit overwhelming to see the version attached to every single "base" package. Would be better to omit and then actually include on "package:base":
< .REF$state > .NEW$state @@ 2,15 @@ @@ 2,15 @@ ~ An object of class "unitizerGlobalSta ~ An object of class "unitizerGlobalSta ~ te" ~ te" Slot "search.path": Slot "search.path": [1] ".GlobalEnv" [1] ".GlobalEnv" < [2] "package:ggplot2 (v1.0.1)" > [2] "package:ggplot2 (v2.2.0)" < [3] "package:alike (v1.0.0)" > [3] "package:alike (v1.1.0)" < [4] "package:unitizer (v1.0.11)" > [4] "package:unitizer (v1.3.0.9000)" < [5] "package:stats (v3.2.2)" > [5] "package:stats (v3.3.2)" < [6] "package:graphics (v3.2.2)" > [6] "package:graphics (v3.3.2)" < [7] "package:grDevices (v3.2.2)" > [7] "package:grDevices (v3.3.2)" < [8] "package:utils (v3.2.2)" > [8] "package:utils (v3.3.2)" < [9] "package:datasets (v3.2.2)" > [9] "package:datasets (v3.3.2)" < [10] "package:methods (v3.2.2)" > [10] "package:methods (v3.3.2)" [11] "Autoloads" [11] "Autoloads" < [12] "package:base (v3.2.2)" > [12] "package:base (v)"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
b3e0b26
No branches or pull requests
A bit overwhelming to see the version attached to every single "base" package. Would be better to omit and then actually include on "package:base":
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: