[I originally followed up in ticket #773 but I making a new ticket since it seems it was missed since that is closed]
But I just got around to testing with the \graphicspath fix from above. I'm not sure whether I'm making a mistake?, or whether there is another bug here? So I will post here and see.
See this ZIP for simple example http://ul.to/c8nb1z9q (sorry I can't see how to attach to the ticket).
Here is my: \graphicspath{{../../fig/},{../fig/}} where my figures are located in the 2nd folder. When I use these commands:
latexml graphicspath.tex --dest=OUT.xml
latexmlpost OUT --dest=OUT.html
I get an error about missing graphics file:
(Graphics OUT.html processing...
Warning:expected:source No graphic source specified; skipping
In Post::Graphics[@0x4656748] ->processGraphic
0.03 sec)
But if I manually add the "../fig" folder to the path like this:
latexml graphicspath.tex --dest=OUT.xml --path=../fig
latexmlpost OUT --dest=OUT.html
then the figure is found.
So I'm wondering whether this extra `--path=../fig' is actually necessary? I would assume it isn't and that the ../fig folder should be picked up from \graphicspath. But maybe I'm wrong?
[I originally followed up in ticket #773 but I making a new ticket since it seems it was missed since that is closed]
But I just got around to testing with the \graphicspath fix from above. I'm not sure whether I'm making a mistake?, or whether there is another bug here? So I will post here and see.
See this ZIP for simple example http://ul.to/c8nb1z9q (sorry I can't see how to attach to the ticket).
Here is my:
\graphicspath{{../../fig/},{../fig/}}where my figures are located in the 2nd folder. When I use these commands:I get an error about missing graphics file:
But if I manually add the "../fig" folder to the path like this:
then the figure is found.
So I'm wondering whether this extra `--path=../fig' is actually necessary? I would assume it isn't and that the ../fig folder should be picked up from \graphicspath. But maybe I'm wrong?