I am writing a binding for icml2017.sty. When naively trying to use InputDefinitions('icml2017', type => 'sty', noltxml => 1), it fails when trying to load ltxcmds.sty:
(Processing definitions /app/local/icml2017/icml2017.sty...
(Loading /usr/local/share/perl/5.24.1/LaTeXML/Package/fancyhdr.sty.ltxml... 0.00 sec)
(Loading /usr/local/share/perl/5.24.1/LaTeXML/Package/color.sty.ltxml... 0.01 sec)
(Processing definitions /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/latex/eso-pic/eso-pic.sty...
(Processing definitions /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek/atbegshi.sty...
(Processing definitions /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek/infwarerr.sty... 0.06 sec)
(Processing definitions /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek/ltxcmds.sty... 0.11 sec)
Error:latex:\GenericError LaTeX Error: Command \ already defined. Or name \end... illegal, see p.192 of the manual
at /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek/atbegshi.sty; line 188 col 47
See the LaTeX manual or LaTeX Companion for explanation.
In Core::Definition::Primitive[\GenericE... from LaTeX.pool.ltxml line 4192
<= Core::Stomach[@0x560c1d12b8e8] <= Core::Gullet[@0x560c1d12a9d0] <= Core::Definition::Constructor[\Requir... <= ...
File /usr/local/share/perl/5.24.1/LaTeXML/Package/icml2017.sty.ltxml had an error:
Fatal:unexpected:<endgroup> Attempt to pop last locked stack frame
at /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek/atbegshi.sty; line 188 col 47
In Core::Stomach[@0x560c1d12b8e8] at /usr/share/texlive/texmf-dist/tex/generic/oberdiek/atbegshi.sty; line 188 col 47
<= Core::Definition::Primitive[End] <= Core::Stomach[@0x560c1d12b8e8] <= Core::Gullet[@0x560c1d12a9d0] <= Core::Definition::Constructor[\Requir... <= Core::Stomach[@0x560c1d12b8e8] <= Core::Gullet[@0x560c1d12a9d0] <= Core::Definition::Constructor[\Requir... <= Core::Stomach[@0x560c1d12b8e8] <= Core::Gullet[@0x560c1d12a9d0] <= Core::Definition::Constructor[\usepac... <= Core::Stomach[@0x560c1d12b8e8]
1 error; 1 fatal error
Just to better understand your process for supporting this sort of thing... Presumably the ideal situation is that ltxcmds.sty.ltxml would use InputDefinitions('ltxcmds', type => 'sty', noltxml => 1) and override things that need overriding.
But, in the meantime, a ltxcmds.sty.ltxml could be written that doesn't use InputDefinitions(...) to get round the fact it doesn't parse.
Does that sound about right?
I am writing a binding for icml2017.sty. When naively trying to use
InputDefinitions('icml2017', type => 'sty', noltxml => 1), it fails when trying to loadltxcmds.sty:Just to better understand your process for supporting this sort of thing... Presumably the ideal situation is that
ltxcmds.sty.ltxmlwould useInputDefinitions('ltxcmds', type => 'sty', noltxml => 1)and override things that need overriding.But, in the meantime, a
ltxcmds.sty.ltxmlcould be written that doesn't useInputDefinitions(...)to get round the fact it doesn't parse.Does that sound about right?