Jump to conversation
Unresolved conversations (0)
Nice work!

Nice work!

All of your conversations have been resolved.

Resolved conversations (3)
@XolphinMartijn XolphinMartijn Oct 25, 2023
```suggestion The rules described in the latest CA/Browser Forum Bylaws SHALL apply to all ballots, including Draft Guideline Ballots. ```
Outdated
CSCWG-charter.md
@dzacharo dzacharo Sep 21, 2023
Small improvement. ```suggestion Additionally the authorized scope of the CSCWG SHALL be to discuss, adopt, and maintain policies, frameworks and sets of standard related to the issuance of management of timestamp certificates by third-party Certificate Issuers under a publicly trusted root, limited to timestamp certificates containing a Certificate Policy Identifier value of "2.23.140.1.4.2" in its certificatePolicies extension. ```
Outdated
CSCWG-charter.md
@dzacharo dzacharo Sep 21, 2023
According to the Bylaws section 2.3 (7) says: > A ballot result will be considered valid only when more than half of the number of currently active Voting Members has participated. The number of currently active Voting Members is the average number of Voting Member organizations that have participated in the previous three (3) Forum Meetings and Forum Teleconferences. Since the WG has already been established, I don't think we need transition measures. I have some slight modifications. ```suggestion In order for a ballot to be adopted by the Code Signing Certificates Working Group, two-thirds or more of the votes cast by the Certificate Issuers must be in favor of the ballot and more than 50% of the votes cast by the Certificate Consumers must be in favor of the ballot. At least one member of each class must vote in favor of a ballot for it to be adopted. Quorum is defined as more than half the average number of Voting Members that have participated in the previous three (3) Code Signing Certificate Working Group Meetings or Teleconferences (not counting subcommittee meetings thereof). ```
Outdated
CSCWG-charter.md
XolphinMartijn