Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Allow Aggregate Graphs to Sum Bandwidth and Percentile COMMENTS #1529

Closed
YangShenghui2018 opened this issue Apr 12, 2018 · 1 comment
Closed

Allow Aggregate Graphs to Sum Bandwidth and Percentile COMMENTS #1529

YangShenghui2018 opened this issue Apr 12, 2018 · 1 comment
Labels
aggregate Aggregate related issue

Comments

@YangShenghui2018
Copy link

11

When will this function be added ? Dear author, do you forget it #900 ? ^_^
@cigamit cigamit added the aggregate Aggregate related issue label Apr 21, 2018
@cigamit cigamit changed the title why the aggregated graph cannot add 95th Percentile Allow Aggregate Graphs to Sum Bandwidth and Percentile COMMENTS Apr 22, 2018
cigamit added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 22, 2018
@cigamit
Resolving Issues #1200 and #1529
a44890e 
Bandwidth and Nth Percentile Comments should be allowed in Aggregate
graphs.  They were allowed in the 1.x version of Cacti.  This
enhancement returns that feature.

This change also removes title attributes from disabled comments.
@cigamit
Copy link
Member

cigamit commented Apr 22, 2018

This issue is resolved. You can backport this change to 1.1.38 without issue.

@cigamit cigamit closed this as completed Apr 22, 2018
@YangShenghui2018 YangShenghui2018 mentioned this issue May 19, 2018
Closed
@tyinet tyinet mentioned this issue May 31, 2018
Closed
@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jun 30, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
aggregate Aggregate related issue
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@cigamit @YangShenghui2018