We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
In 4.0 we will remove implicit scope walking, we should allow people to opt-in to the old behavior by using a function on the scope.
scope
So instead of something like {{../../../foo}} you could use something like {{scope.get('foo')}}.
{{../../../foo}}
{{scope.get('foo')}}
This will allow an easier upgrade path for people who have a lot of implicit scope walking.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think I'm going to make this API {{scope.find('foo')}}. cc @justinbmeyer
{{scope.find('foo')}}
Sorry, something went wrong.
closed by #126.
No branches or pull requests
In 4.0 we will remove implicit scope walking, we should allow people to opt-in to the old behavior by using a function on the
scope
.So instead of something like
{{../../../foo}}
you could use something like{{scope.get('foo')}}
.This will allow an easier upgrade path for people who have a lot of implicit scope walking.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: