Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CanJS 4.0 #3140

Closed
christopherjbaker opened this Issue Mar 30, 2017 · 4 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
4 participants
@christopherjbaker
Copy link
Contributor

christopherjbaker commented Mar 30, 2017

4.0 release:

Observables:

  • - can-define
  • - can-map, can-list
  • - can-map-define
  • - can-observe
  • - can-route
  • - can-route-pushstate

Model:

  • - can-connect
  • - can-connect w/ can-observe

View:

  • can-component
  • can-stache
  • can-stache-bindings
  • - can-view-parse w/ removed regexp delimiters
  • - can-stache-converters
  • - steal-stache

Other:

  • - can-fixture
  • - works in Edge
  • - can-control (needs fix to go back to events)
  • - RVM?

4.0 - How much dead code can we remove? What do we want to break?

  • Anything "ok" in 3.0 still works.
  • @index
  • can-click, can-value
  • can-control processers
  • foo bar ..
  • helpers always pass values ... ~
  • {{#each(items)}}

import template from "foo.stache!can-stache3"

NEW WAY OF DOING THINGS

  • can-element - w/ or w/o shadow DOM
  • ES class
  • Observables based on can-define
  • new binding syntaxes
  • new Connection()
  • stache (cleaned up / removed) AND JSX option
@matthewp

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

matthewp commented Mar 31, 2017

How are we deciding what is going to be in CanJS 4.0?

@justinbmeyer

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

justinbmeyer commented Mar 31, 2017

@matthewp I'm not sure how we are going to decide what's in CanJS 4.0. For now, this is just a catch-all epic for issues that can not be done w/o breaking changes.

@frank-dspeed

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

frank-dspeed commented Apr 3, 2017

we should add #3145

@christopherjbaker

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

christopherjbaker commented Feb 22, 2018

can this be closed now, @justinbmeyer?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.