Add support for breaking a waterfall chain #85

wants to merge 2 commits into


None yet
4 participants

jnordberg commented Jan 30, 2012

This patch allows for more fine-grained control of a waterfall chain. Calling at any point in the waterfall will jump to the completion callback skipping any steps left in the chain.

Refs #11

Actually I found that we can skip to the final function by passing 'error' = true like this:

async.waterfall([function (callback) {
callback(null); // <--- go to next fn
function (callback) {
callback(true); // <--- skip to the last fn
function (callback) {
callback(null); // <--- this fn will not be called
], callback);

So your patch is probably not necessary. :)

jnordberg, this is useful functionality. I have a waterfall function that checks different datasources in order trying to find an object. If a match is found, than I'd like the waterfall to skip the remaining functions and go straight to the final callback for rendering.

tot2ivn, while your approach works, the results aren't passed through, and this doesn't work if you've built custom error handling.


caolan commented Feb 4, 2013

I think in this circumstance you could use a closure and async.whilst or async.until, or just use a named function for the final callback and call that instead of the task callback passed into the successful task function.

caolan closed this Feb 4, 2013

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment