Permalink
| // Copyright (c) 2013-2014 Sandstorm Development Group, Inc. and contributors | |
| // Licensed under the MIT License: | |
| // | |
| // Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy | |
| // of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal | |
| // in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights | |
| // to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell | |
| // copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is | |
| // furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: | |
| // | |
| // The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in | |
| // all copies or substantial portions of the Software. | |
| // | |
| // THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR | |
| // IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, | |
| // FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE | |
| // AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER | |
| // LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, | |
| // OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN | |
| // THE SOFTWARE. | |
| #include "calculator.capnp.h" | |
| #include <capnp/ez-rpc.h> | |
| #include <kj/debug.h> | |
| #include <math.h> | |
| #include <iostream> | |
| class PowerFunction final: public Calculator::Function::Server { | |
| // An implementation of the Function interface wrapping pow(). Note that | |
| // we're implementing this on the client side and will pass a reference to | |
| // the server. The server will then be able to make calls back to the client. | |
| public: | |
| kj::Promise<void> call(CallContext context) { | |
| auto params = context.getParams().getParams(); | |
| KJ_REQUIRE(params.size() == 2, "Wrong number of parameters."); | |
| context.getResults().setValue(pow(params[0], params[1])); | |
| return kj::READY_NOW; | |
| } | |
| }; | |
| int main(int argc, const char* argv[]) { | |
| if (argc != 2) { | |
| std::cerr << "usage: " << argv[0] << " HOST:PORT\n" | |
| "Connects to the Calculator server at the given address and " | |
| "does some RPCs." << std::endl; | |
| return 1; | |
| } | |
| capnp::EzRpcClient client(argv[1]); | |
| Calculator::Client calculator = client.getMain<Calculator>(); | |
| // Keep an eye on `waitScope`. Whenever you see it used is a place where we | |
| // stop and wait for the server to respond. If a line of code does not use | |
| // `waitScope`, then it does not block! | |
| auto& waitScope = client.getWaitScope(); | |
| { | |
| // Make a request that just evaluates the literal value 123. | |
| // | |
| // What's interesting here is that evaluate() returns a "Value", which is | |
| // another interface and therefore points back to an object living on the | |
| // server. We then have to call read() on that object to read it. | |
| // However, even though we are making two RPC's, this block executes in | |
| // *one* network round trip because of promise pipelining: we do not wait | |
| // for the first call to complete before we send the second call to the | |
| // server. | |
| std::cout << "Evaluating a literal... "; | |
| std::cout.flush(); | |
| // Set up the request. | |
| auto request = calculator.evaluateRequest(); | |
| request.getExpression().setLiteral(123); | |
| // Send it, which returns a promise for the result (without blocking). | |
| auto evalPromise = request.send(); | |
| // Using the promise, create a pipelined request to call read() on the | |
| // returned object, and then send that. | |
| auto readPromise = evalPromise.getValue().readRequest().send(); | |
| // Now that we've sent all the requests, wait for the response. Until this | |
| // point, we haven't waited at all! | |
| auto response = readPromise.wait(waitScope); | |
| KJ_ASSERT(response.getValue() == 123); | |
| std::cout << "PASS" << std::endl; | |
| } | |
| { | |
| // Make a request to evaluate 123 + 45 - 67. | |
| // | |
| // The Calculator interface requires that we first call getOperator() to | |
| // get the addition and subtraction functions, then call evaluate() to use | |
| // them. But, once again, we can get both functions, call evaluate(), and | |
| // then read() the result -- four RPCs -- in the time of *one* network | |
| // round trip, because of promise pipelining. | |
| std::cout << "Using add and subtract... "; | |
| std::cout.flush(); | |
| Calculator::Function::Client add = nullptr; | |
| Calculator::Function::Client subtract = nullptr; | |
| { | |
| // Get the "add" function from the server. | |
| auto request = calculator.getOperatorRequest(); | |
| request.setOp(Calculator::Operator::ADD); | |
| add = request.send().getFunc(); | |
| } | |
| { | |
| // Get the "subtract" function from the server. | |
| auto request = calculator.getOperatorRequest(); | |
| request.setOp(Calculator::Operator::SUBTRACT); | |
| subtract = request.send().getFunc(); | |
| } | |
| // Build the request to evaluate 123 + 45 - 67. | |
| auto request = calculator.evaluateRequest(); | |
| auto subtractCall = request.getExpression().initCall(); | |
| subtractCall.setFunction(subtract); | |
| auto subtractParams = subtractCall.initParams(2); | |
| subtractParams[1].setLiteral(67); | |
| auto addCall = subtractParams[0].initCall(); | |
| addCall.setFunction(add); | |
| auto addParams = addCall.initParams(2); | |
| addParams[0].setLiteral(123); | |
| addParams[1].setLiteral(45); | |
| // Send the evaluate() request, read() the result, and wait for read() to | |
| // finish. | |
| auto evalPromise = request.send(); | |
| auto readPromise = evalPromise.getValue().readRequest().send(); | |
| auto response = readPromise.wait(waitScope); | |
| KJ_ASSERT(response.getValue() == 101); | |
| std::cout << "PASS" << std::endl; | |
| } | |
| { | |
| // Make a request to evaluate 4 * 6, then use the result in two more | |
| // requests that add 3 and 5. | |
| // | |
| // Since evaluate() returns its result wrapped in a `Value`, we can pass | |
| // that `Value` back to the server in subsequent requests before the first | |
| // `evaluate()` has actually returned. Thus, this example again does only | |
| // one network round trip. | |
| std::cout << "Pipelining eval() calls... "; | |
| std::cout.flush(); | |
| Calculator::Function::Client add = nullptr; | |
| Calculator::Function::Client multiply = nullptr; | |
| { | |
| // Get the "add" function from the server. | |
| auto request = calculator.getOperatorRequest(); | |
| request.setOp(Calculator::Operator::ADD); | |
| add = request.send().getFunc(); | |
| } | |
| { | |
| // Get the "multiply" function from the server. | |
| auto request = calculator.getOperatorRequest(); | |
| request.setOp(Calculator::Operator::MULTIPLY); | |
| multiply = request.send().getFunc(); | |
| } | |
| // Build the request to evaluate 4 * 6 | |
| auto request = calculator.evaluateRequest(); | |
| auto multiplyCall = request.getExpression().initCall(); | |
| multiplyCall.setFunction(multiply); | |
| auto multiplyParams = multiplyCall.initParams(2); | |
| multiplyParams[0].setLiteral(4); | |
| multiplyParams[1].setLiteral(6); | |
| auto multiplyResult = request.send().getValue(); | |
| // Use the result in two calls that add 3 and add 5. | |
| auto add3Request = calculator.evaluateRequest(); | |
| auto add3Call = add3Request.getExpression().initCall(); | |
| add3Call.setFunction(add); | |
| auto add3Params = add3Call.initParams(2); | |
| add3Params[0].setPreviousResult(multiplyResult); | |
| add3Params[1].setLiteral(3); | |
| auto add3Promise = add3Request.send().getValue().readRequest().send(); | |
| auto add5Request = calculator.evaluateRequest(); | |
| auto add5Call = add5Request.getExpression().initCall(); | |
| add5Call.setFunction(add); | |
| auto add5Params = add5Call.initParams(2); | |
| add5Params[0].setPreviousResult(multiplyResult); | |
| add5Params[1].setLiteral(5); | |
| auto add5Promise = add5Request.send().getValue().readRequest().send(); | |
| // Now wait for the results. | |
| KJ_ASSERT(add3Promise.wait(waitScope).getValue() == 27); | |
| KJ_ASSERT(add5Promise.wait(waitScope).getValue() == 29); | |
| std::cout << "PASS" << std::endl; | |
| } | |
| { | |
| // Our calculator interface supports defining functions. Here we use it | |
| // to define two functions and then make calls to them as follows: | |
| // | |
| // f(x, y) = x * 100 + y | |
| // g(x) = f(x, x + 1) * 2; | |
| // f(12, 34) | |
| // g(21) | |
| // | |
| // Once again, the whole thing takes only one network round trip. | |
| std::cout << "Defining functions... "; | |
| std::cout.flush(); | |
| Calculator::Function::Client add = nullptr; | |
| Calculator::Function::Client multiply = nullptr; | |
| Calculator::Function::Client f = nullptr; | |
| Calculator::Function::Client g = nullptr; | |
| { | |
| // Get the "add" function from the server. | |
| auto request = calculator.getOperatorRequest(); | |
| request.setOp(Calculator::Operator::ADD); | |
| add = request.send().getFunc(); | |
| } | |
| { | |
| // Get the "multiply" function from the server. | |
| auto request = calculator.getOperatorRequest(); | |
| request.setOp(Calculator::Operator::MULTIPLY); | |
| multiply = request.send().getFunc(); | |
| } | |
| { | |
| // Define f. | |
| auto request = calculator.defFunctionRequest(); | |
| request.setParamCount(2); | |
| { | |
| // Build the function body. | |
| auto addCall = request.getBody().initCall(); | |
| addCall.setFunction(add); | |
| auto addParams = addCall.initParams(2); | |
| addParams[1].setParameter(1); // y | |
| auto multiplyCall = addParams[0].initCall(); | |
| multiplyCall.setFunction(multiply); | |
| auto multiplyParams = multiplyCall.initParams(2); | |
| multiplyParams[0].setParameter(0); // x | |
| multiplyParams[1].setLiteral(100); | |
| } | |
| f = request.send().getFunc(); | |
| } | |
| { | |
| // Define g. | |
| auto request = calculator.defFunctionRequest(); | |
| request.setParamCount(1); | |
| { | |
| // Build the function body. | |
| auto multiplyCall = request.getBody().initCall(); | |
| multiplyCall.setFunction(multiply); | |
| auto multiplyParams = multiplyCall.initParams(2); | |
| multiplyParams[1].setLiteral(2); | |
| auto fCall = multiplyParams[0].initCall(); | |
| fCall.setFunction(f); | |
| auto fParams = fCall.initParams(2); | |
| fParams[0].setParameter(0); | |
| auto addCall = fParams[1].initCall(); | |
| addCall.setFunction(add); | |
| auto addParams = addCall.initParams(2); | |
| addParams[0].setParameter(0); | |
| addParams[1].setLiteral(1); | |
| } | |
| g = request.send().getFunc(); | |
| } | |
| // OK, we've defined all our functions. Now create our eval requests. | |
| // f(12, 34) | |
| auto fEvalRequest = calculator.evaluateRequest(); | |
| auto fCall = fEvalRequest.initExpression().initCall(); | |
| fCall.setFunction(f); | |
| auto fParams = fCall.initParams(2); | |
| fParams[0].setLiteral(12); | |
| fParams[1].setLiteral(34); | |
| auto fEvalPromise = fEvalRequest.send().getValue().readRequest().send(); | |
| // g(21) | |
| auto gEvalRequest = calculator.evaluateRequest(); | |
| auto gCall = gEvalRequest.initExpression().initCall(); | |
| gCall.setFunction(g); | |
| gCall.initParams(1)[0].setLiteral(21); | |
| auto gEvalPromise = gEvalRequest.send().getValue().readRequest().send(); | |
| // Wait for the results. | |
| KJ_ASSERT(fEvalPromise.wait(waitScope).getValue() == 1234); | |
| KJ_ASSERT(gEvalPromise.wait(waitScope).getValue() == 4244); | |
| std::cout << "PASS" << std::endl; | |
| } | |
| { | |
| // Make a request that will call back to a function defined locally. | |
| // | |
| // Specifically, we will compute 2^(4 + 5). However, exponent is not | |
| // defined by the Calculator server. So, we'll implement the Function | |
| // interface locally and pass it to the server for it to use when | |
| // evaluating the expression. | |
| // | |
| // This example requires two network round trips to complete, because the | |
| // server calls back to the client once before finishing. In this | |
| // particular case, this could potentially be optimized by using a tail | |
| // call on the server side -- see CallContext::tailCall(). However, to | |
| // keep the example simpler, we haven't implemented this optimization in | |
| // the sample server. | |
| std::cout << "Using a callback... "; | |
| std::cout.flush(); | |
| Calculator::Function::Client add = nullptr; | |
| { | |
| // Get the "add" function from the server. | |
| auto request = calculator.getOperatorRequest(); | |
| request.setOp(Calculator::Operator::ADD); | |
| add = request.send().getFunc(); | |
| } | |
| // Build the eval request for 2^(4+5). | |
| auto request = calculator.evaluateRequest(); | |
| auto powCall = request.getExpression().initCall(); | |
| powCall.setFunction(kj::heap<PowerFunction>()); | |
| auto powParams = powCall.initParams(2); | |
| powParams[0].setLiteral(2); | |
| auto addCall = powParams[1].initCall(); | |
| addCall.setFunction(add); | |
| auto addParams = addCall.initParams(2); | |
| addParams[0].setLiteral(4); | |
| addParams[1].setLiteral(5); | |
| // Send the request and wait. | |
| auto response = request.send().getValue().readRequest() | |
| .send().wait(waitScope); | |
| KJ_ASSERT(response.getValue() == 512); | |
| std::cout << "PASS" << std::endl; | |
| } | |
| return 0; | |
| } |