Join 36 million developers who use GitHub
issues to help identify, assign, and keep track of the features and
bug fixes your projects need.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and
privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub?
to your account
Might want to rename sm_model to sm_cnn_model to be consistent with @Jeffyrao 's impl?
Or even just sm_cnn?
@rosequ @salman1993 How might the renaming affect the anserini e2e connection? Are there any hardcoded statements that will need to be addressed for this change?
@gauravbaruah bumping this issue again. to be consistent with other models that we've merged in, should we rename to sm_cnn?
renaming sm_model; faster bridge (#18) (#22)
+ renamed sm_model
+ faster bridge by obtaining the IDF scores of a term directly from the Java server
This issue is resolved. Can we close it now?
Merge pull request castorini#18 from achyudhk/master
Add single_label support for XML-CNN