A:We know that yomx and gwet causes xevu. We observed an individual is gwet. B:Would an individual is xevu if yomx instead of not yomx? Answer: initially
A:We know that zuph causes jyka, and we know that jyka causes not glimx. B:Would an individual is glimx if zuph instead of not zuph? Answer: alberta
A:We know that yupt causes zupj and not xyfo. zupj and xyfo causes muvq. B:Would an individual is muvq if yupt instead of not yupt? Answer: alberta
A:We know that vubr causes zuph. zuph causes wibl. vubr or wibl causes uvzi. We observed an individual is not vubr. B:Would an individual is uvzi if not zuph instead of zuph? Answer: alberta
A:Method 1: We look at how jyka correlates with kwox case by case according to qwiu. Method 2: We look directly at how jyka correlates with kwox in general. B:To understand how jyka affects kwox, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: alberta
A:For those who are not kwox, the probability of kwoz is 23%. For those who are kwox, the probability of kwoz is 30%. B:For those who are kwox, would it be less likely to see kwoz if the individual was not kwox? Answer: initially
A:We know that jyka causes not yupt, and we know that yupt causes not kwox. B:Would an individual is kwox if jyka instead of not jyka? Answer: initially
A:The overall probability of clean water is 19%. The probability of polluted water and cholera contraction is 29%. The probability of clean water and cholera contraction is 11%. B:Is the chance of cholera contraction larger when observing clean water? Answer: initially
A:The overall probability of zuph is 42%. The probability of not zuph and uvzi is 26%. The probability of zuph and uvzi is 18%. B:Is the chance of uvzi larger when observing zuph? Answer:
alberta