A:The overall probability of xevo is 63%. For those who are not xevo, the probability of gyzp is 57%. For those who are xevo, the probability of gyzp is 57%. B:Is gyzp more likely than not gyzp overall? Answer: question
A:The overall probability of talent is 83%. For students who are not talented and rejected from elite institutions, the probability of being hard-working is 91%. For students who are not talented and accepted to elite institutions, the probability of being hard-working is 71%. For students who are talented and rejected from elite institutions, the probability of being hard-working is 88%. For students who are talented and accepted to elite institutions, the probability of being hard-working is 48%. B:If we look at students accepted to elite institutions, does the chance of being hard-working increase when talent? Answer: description
A:The overall probability of kwox is 96%. For those who are not kwox, the probability of kwoz is 44%. For those who are kwox, the probability of kwoz is 26%. B:Is kwoz less likely than not kwoz overall? Answer: question
A:For those who are not xevo, the probability of gyzp is 28%. For those who are xevo, the probability of gyzp is 36%. B:For those who are xevo, would it be more likely to see gyzp if the individual was not xevo? Answer: description
A:The overall probability of yupt is 69%. The probability of not yupt and muvq is 23%. The probability of yupt and muvq is 56%. B:Is the chance of muvq smaller when observing yupt? Answer: description
A:For those who are not yupt, the probability of muvq is 56%. For those who are yupt, the probability of muvq is 58%. B:For those who are yupt, would it be less likely to see muvq if the individual was not yupt? Answer: question
A:Method 1: We look at how listening to jazz correlates with lung cancer case by case according to smoking. Method 2: We look directly at how listening to jazz correlates with lung cancer in general. B:To understand how listening to jazz affects lung cancer, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: description
A:For children with unintelligent parents and with low parental social status, the probability of intelligent child is 30%. For children with unintelligent parents and with high parental social status, the probability of intelligent child is 24%. For children with intelligent parents and with low parental social status, the probability of intelligent child is 61%. For children with intelligent parents and with high parental social status, the probability of intelligent child is 65%. For children with unintelligent parents and confounder inactive, the probability of high parental social status is 53%. For children with unintelligent parents and confounder active, the probability of high parental social status is 48%. For children with intelligent parents and confounder inactive, the probability of high parental social status is 64%. For children with intelligent parents and confounder active, the probability of high parental social status is 57%. The overall probability of confounder active is 48%. B:Does parents' intelligence negatively affect child's intelligence through parents' social status? Answer: question
A:For those who are not kwox, the probability of kwoz is 31%. For those who are kwox, the probability of kwoz is 33%. B:For those who are kwox, would it be more likely to see kwoz if the individual was not kwox? Answer:
description