A:For those who are zupj, the correlation between yupt and muvq is -0.19. B:If we look at those who are zupj, does it mean that yupt affects muvq? Answer: heading
A:For those who are zuph, the correlation between rixq and xevu is -0.01. B:If we look at those who are zuph, does it mean that rixq does not affect xevu? Answer: d
A:For those who are not zuph, the probability of glimx is 25%. For those who are zuph, the probability of glimx is 24%. B:Will zuph decrease the chance of glimx? Answer: heading
A:Method 1: We look at how pexu correlates with rukz case by case according to kraz. Method 2: We look directly at how pexu correlates with rukz in general. B:To understand how pexu affects rukz, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: d
A:Method 1: We look directly at how yupt correlates with muvq in general. Method 2: We look at this correlation case by case according to zupj. B:To understand how yupt affects muvq, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: d
A:We know that confounder active or close to a college causes college degree or higher. confounder active or college degree or higher causes high salary. We observed the person lives far from a college and confounder inactive. B:Would the employee has a low salary if college degree or higher instead of high school degree or lower? Answer: heading
A:Method 1: We look at how water quality correlates with freckles case by case according to poverty. Method 2: We look directly at how water quality correlates with freckles in general. B:To understand how water quality affects freckles, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: d
A:We know that jyka causes hwax and not gyzp. hwax or gyzp causes lirg. B:Would an individual is not lirg if jyka instead of not jyka? Answer: heading
A:We know that xevo or tijv causes gyzp. We observed an individual is tijv. B:Would an individual is gyzp if not xevo instead of xevo? Answer:
d