A:For nonsmokers, the probability of high tar deposit is 56%. For smokers, the probability of high tar deposit is 83%. For nonsmokers and with no tar deposit, the probability of being allergic to peanuts is 42%. For nonsmokers and with high tar deposit, the probability of being allergic to peanuts is 83%. For smokers and with no tar deposit, the probability of being allergic to peanuts is 48%. For smokers and with high tar deposit, the probability of being allergic to peanuts is 74%. The overall probability of smoking is 45%. B:Will smoking decrease the chance of being allergic to peanuts? Answer: page
A:For those who are not jyka, the probability of hwax is 75%. For those who are jyka, the probability of hwax is 36%. For those who are not jyka and are not hwax, the probability of lirg is 33%. For those who are not jyka and are hwax, the probability of lirg is 70%. For those who are jyka and are not hwax, the probability of lirg is 51%. For those who are jyka and are hwax, the probability of lirg is 64%. The overall probability of jyka is 99%. B:Does jyka positively affect lirg through hwax? Answer: page
A:For those who are not zuph and are not wibl, the probability of uvzi is 74%. For those who are not zuph and are wibl, the probability of uvzi is 63%. For those who are zuph and are not wibl, the probability of uvzi is 62%. For those who are zuph and are wibl, the probability of uvzi is 25%. For those who are not zuph and are not vubr, the probability of wibl is 59%. For those who are not zuph and are vubr, the probability of wibl is 14%. For those who are zuph and are not vubr, the probability of wibl is 42%. For those who are zuph and are vubr, the probability of wibl is 8%. The overall probability of vubr is 49%. B:If we disregard the mediation effect through wibl, would zuph negatively affect uvzi? Answer: blame
A:Method 1: We look directly at how zuph correlates with glimx in general. Method 2: We look at this correlation case by case according to jyka. B:To understand how zuph affects glimx, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: blame
A:For those who choose to take the stairs, the probability of penguin death is 65%. For those who choose to take the elevator, the probability of penguin death is 55%. B:For those who choose to take the elevator, would it be less likely to see penguin death if I had taken the stairs? Answer: page
A:We know that zory causes zuph. zuph causes jyka. zory and jyka causes glimx. We observed an individual is zory. B:Would an individual is not glimx if not zuph instead of zuph? Answer: blame
A:Method 1: We look at how kwox correlates with kwoz case by case according to swoq. Method 2: We look directly at how kwox correlates with kwoz in general. B:To understand how kwox affects kwoz, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: page
A:The overall probability of zuph is 85%. For those who are not zuph and are not wibl, the probability of uvzi is 100%. For those who are not zuph and are wibl, the probability of uvzi is 100%. For those who are zuph and are not wibl, the probability of uvzi is 100%. For those who are zuph and are wibl, the probability of uvzi is 100%. B:If we look at those who are wibl, does the chance of uvzi decrease when zuph? Answer: blame
A:Method 1: We look directly at how my decision correlates with penguin survival in general. Method 2: We look at this correlation case by case according to penguin mood. B:To understand how my decision affects penguin survival, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer:
blame