A:For those who are not zuph, the probability of uvzi is 66%. For those who are zuph, the probability of uvzi is 32%. B:For those who are zuph, would it be more likely to see uvzi if the individual was not zuph? Answer: usc
A:For those who are not rixq, the probability of xevu is 55%. For those who are rixq, the probability of xevu is 5%. B:Will rixq increase the chance of xevu? Answer: via
A:The overall probability of kwox is 68%. For those who are not kwox, the probability of kwoz is 48%. For those who are kwox, the probability of kwoz is 36%. B:Is kwoz less likely than not kwoz overall? Answer: usc
A:The overall probability of jyka is 4%. For those who are not jyka, the probability of kwox is 56%. For those who are jyka, the probability of kwox is 35%. B:Is kwox less likely than not kwox overall? Answer: via
A:Method 1: We look at how yomx correlates with xevu case by case according to gwet. Method 2: We look directly at how yomx correlates with xevu in general. B:To understand how yomx affects xevu, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: via
A:The overall probability of citrus intake is 3%. The probability of absence of citrus and curly hair is 72%. The probability of citrus intake and curly hair is 2%. B:Is the chance of curly hair smaller when observing citrus intake? Answer: usc
A:We know that zuph causes wibl and vubr. wibl or vubr causes uvzi. B:Would an individual is not uvzi if zuph instead of not zuph? Answer: via
A:Method 1: We look at how yomx correlates with xevu case by case according to gwet. Method 2: We look directly at how yomx correlates with xevu in general. B:To understand how yomx affects xevu, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: usc
A:We know that jyka causes not zuph and zory. zuph or zory causes glimx. We observed an individual is jyka. B:Would an individual is glimx if not zuph instead of zuph? Answer:
via