A:We know that kwox and swoq causes kwoz. We observed an individual is swoq. B:Would an individual is kwoz if not kwox instead of kwox? Answer: uni
A:Method 1: We look directly at how yupt correlates with muvq in general. Method 2: We look at this correlation case by case according to zupj. B:To understand how yupt affects muvq, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: stage
A:Method 1: We look directly at how having a brother correlates with disease in general. Method 2: We look at this correlation case by case according to pre-conditions. B:To understand how having a brother affects disease, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: uni
A:The overall probability of having a brother is 92%. The probability of not having a brother and high salary is 2%. The probability of having a brother and high salary is 34%. B:Is the chance of high salary smaller when observing having a brother? Answer: uni
A:We know that smoking causes being hard-working. smoking and being hard-working causes college admission. B:Would the student gets admitted to college if smoking instead of nonsmoking? Answer: stage
A:The overall probability of kwox is 49%. For those who are not kwox, the probability of kwoz is 21%. For those who are kwox, the probability of kwoz is 58%. B:Is kwoz less likely than not kwoz overall? Answer: stage
A:We know that jyka causes yupt and not qwiu. yupt and qwiu causes kwox. B:Would an individual is not kwox if not jyka instead of jyka? Answer: stage
A:For those who are not yupt, the probability of muvq is 41%. For those who are yupt, the probability of muvq is 57%. B:For those who are yupt, would it be more likely to see muvq if the individual was not yupt? Answer: uni
A:The overall probability of jyka is 94%. For those who are not jyka, the probability of lirg is 68%. For those who are jyka, the probability of lirg is 58%. B:Is lirg less likely than not lirg overall? Answer:
uni