A:Method 1: We look at how zuph correlates with uvzi case by case according to wibl. Method 2: We look directly at how zuph correlates with uvzi in general. B:To understand how zuph affects uvzi, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: waiver
A:Method 1: We look directly at how rixq correlates with xevu in general. Method 2: We look at this correlation case by case according to swoy. B:To understand how rixq affects xevu, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: waiver
A:For those who are not zuph, the probability of glimx is 54%. For those who are zuph, the probability of glimx is 5%. B:For those who are zuph, would it be more likely to see glimx if the individual was not zuph? Answer: fabrics
A:The overall probability of jyka is 55%. The probability of not jyka and kwox is 13%. The probability of jyka and kwox is 27%. B:Is the chance of kwox smaller when observing jyka? Answer: waiver
A:For those who are not jyka, the probability of lirg is 36%. For those who are jyka, the probability of lirg is 35%. B:Will jyka decrease the chance of lirg? Answer: fabrics
A:We know that tijv causes not xevo. tijv or xevo causes gyzp. We observed an individual is tijv. B:Would an individual is not gyzp if xevo instead of not xevo? Answer: waiver
A:We know that yupt causes not zupj. yupt and zupj causes muvq. B:Would an individual is not muvq if not yupt instead of yupt? Answer: fabrics
A:We know that pexu or kraz causes hwax. pexu or kraz or hwax causes rukz. We observed an individual is kraz. B:Would an individual is rukz if not pexu instead of pexu? Answer: fabrics
A:The overall probability of rixq is 35%. The probability of not rixq and xevu is 39%. The probability of rixq and xevu is 10%. B:Is the chance of xevu larger when observing rixq? Answer:
waiver