A:The overall probability of yupt is 32%. For those who are not yupt, the probability of muvq is 89%. For those who are yupt, the probability of muvq is 89%. B:Is muvq less likely than not muvq overall? Answer: manufacturer
A:The overall probability of yupt is 70%. For those who are not yupt, the probability of muvq is 90%. For those who are yupt, the probability of muvq is 63%. B:Is muvq more likely than not muvq overall? Answer: trivia
A:Method 1: We look at how zuph correlates with uvzi case by case according to wibl. Method 2: We look directly at how zuph correlates with uvzi in general. B:To understand how zuph affects uvzi, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: manufacturer
A:We know that having visited England or high skill level causes white-collar job. having visited England and high skill level and white-collar job causes high salary. We observed the person has a low skill level. B:Would the employee has a low salary if not having visited England instead of having visited England? Answer: trivia
A:The overall probability of yupt is 70%. For those who are not yupt, the probability of muvq is 60%. For those who are yupt, the probability of muvq is 22%. B:Is muvq less likely than not muvq overall? Answer: trivia
A:The overall probability of attractive appearance is 56%. For people considered unattractive and are not famous, the probability of talent is 7%. For people considered unattractive and are famous, the probability of talent is 18%. For people considered attractive and are not famous, the probability of talent is 4%. For people considered attractive and are famous, the probability of talent is 14%. B:If we look at people who are famous, does the chance of talent increase when attractive appearance? Answer: manufacturer
A:For those who are not rixq, the probability of xevu is 11%. For those who are rixq, the probability of xevu is 28%. B:For those who are rixq, would it be more likely to see xevu if the individual was not rixq? Answer: manufacturer
A:For children with unintelligent parents and with low parental social status, the probability of being lactose intolerant is 91%. For children with unintelligent parents and with high parental social status, the probability of being lactose intolerant is 90%. For children with intelligent parents and with low parental social status, the probability of being lactose intolerant is 45%. For children with intelligent parents and with high parental social status, the probability of being lactose intolerant is 59%. For children with unintelligent parents and confounder inactive, the probability of high parental social status is 63%. For children with unintelligent parents and confounder active, the probability of high parental social status is 42%. For children with intelligent parents and confounder inactive, the probability of high parental social status is 31%. For children with intelligent parents and confounder active, the probability of high parental social status is 9%. The overall probability of confounder active is 56%. B:If we disregard the mediation effect through parents' social status, would parents' intelligence negatively affect lactose intolerance? Answer: trivia
A:For people who do not have a sister and with low blood pressure, the probability of healthy heart is 61%. For people who do not have a sister and with high blood pressure, the probability of healthy heart is 87%. For people who have a sister and with low blood pressure, the probability of healthy heart is 29%. For people who have a sister and with high blood pressure, the probability of healthy heart is 50%. For people who do not have a sister, the probability of high blood pressure is 30%. For people who have a sister, the probability of high blood pressure is 88%. B:Does having a sister negatively affect heart condition through blood pressure? Answer:
manufacturer