A:Method 1: We look at how zuph correlates with uvzi case by case according to wibl. Method 2: We look directly at how zuph correlates with uvzi in general. B:To understand how zuph affects uvzi, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: mistakes
A:Method 1: We look at how zuph correlates with glimx case by case according to jyka. Method 2: We look directly at how zuph correlates with glimx in general. B:To understand how zuph affects glimx, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: wesley
A:We know that jyka causes hwax and not gyzp. hwax and gyzp causes lirg. B:Would an individual is lirg if jyka instead of not jyka? Answer: wesley
A:The overall probability of xevo is 55%. For those who are not xevo, the probability of gyzp is 41%. For those who are xevo, the probability of gyzp is 41%. B:Is gyzp less likely than not gyzp overall? Answer: mistakes
A:The overall probability of jyka is 40%. For those who are not jyka, the probability of lirg is 5%. For those who are jyka, the probability of lirg is 27%. B:Is lirg more likely than not lirg overall? Answer: wesley
A:For those who are not pexu, the probability of rukz is 92%. For those who are pexu, the probability of rukz is 57%. B:For those who are pexu, would it be more likely to see rukz if the individual was not pexu? Answer: mistakes
A:For those who are not jyka, the probability of kwox is 56%. For those who are jyka, the probability of kwox is 43%. B:Will jyka decrease the chance of kwox? Answer: mistakes
A:We know that jyka causes not yupt, and we know that yupt causes kwox. B:Would an individual is not kwox if not jyka instead of jyka? Answer: wesley
A:We know that rixq and zuph causes xevu. We observed an individual is not zuph. B:Would an individual is not xevu if rixq instead of not rixq? Answer:
mistakes