A:The overall probability of pexu is 70%. For those who are not pexu, the probability of rukz is 6%. For those who are pexu, the probability of rukz is 25%. B:Is rukz less likely than not rukz overall? Answer: yen
A:For nonsmokers, the probability of freckles is 64%. For smokers, the probability of freckles is 37%. B:For smokers, would it be more likely to see freckles if the student had been a nonsmoker? Answer: yen
A:For those who are not zuph and are not jyka, the probability of glimx is 62%. For those who are not zuph and are jyka, the probability of glimx is 79%. For those who are zuph and are not jyka, the probability of glimx is 27%. For those who are zuph and are jyka, the probability of glimx is 55%. For those who are not zuph, the probability of jyka is 5%. For those who are zuph, the probability of jyka is 21%. B:For those who are zuph, would it be less likely to see glimx if the individual was not zuph? Answer: yen
A:For patients who are not male and do not have a brother, the probability of recovery is 21%. For patients who are not male and have a brother, the probability of recovery is 35%. For patients who are male and do not have a brother, the probability of recovery is 85%. For patients who are male and have a brother, the probability of recovery is 99%. The overall probability of male gender is 44%. B:Will having a brother decrease the chance of recovery? Answer: keywords
A:For campers who do not light a match, the probability of the forest on fire is 35%. For campers who light a match, the probability of the forest on fire is 84%. B:Will the camper lighting a match decrease the chance of the forest on fire? Answer: keywords
A:The overall probability of kwox is 23%. For those who are not kwox, the probability of kwoz is 88%. For those who are kwox, the probability of kwoz is 55%. B:Is kwoz less likely than not kwoz overall? Answer: keywords
A:For children with unintelligent parents and with low parental social status, the probability of being lactose intolerant is 83%. For children with unintelligent parents and with high parental social status, the probability of being lactose intolerant is 46%. For children with intelligent parents and with low parental social status, the probability of being lactose intolerant is 55%. For children with intelligent parents and with high parental social status, the probability of being lactose intolerant is 20%. For children with unintelligent parents and confounder inactive, the probability of high parental social status is 24%. For children with unintelligent parents and confounder active, the probability of high parental social status is 6%. For children with intelligent parents and confounder inactive, the probability of high parental social status is 40%. For children with intelligent parents and confounder active, the probability of high parental social status is 62%. The overall probability of confounder active is 44%. B:If we disregard the mediation effect through parents' social status, would parents' intelligence positively affect lactose intolerance? Answer: keywords
A:For those who are not pexu, the probability of rukz is 46%. For those who are pexu, the probability of rukz is 15%. B:Will pexu decrease the chance of rukz? Answer: yen
A:Method 1: We look directly at how drug taken correlates with cholesterol level in general. Method 2: We look at this correlation case by case according to unobserved confounders. B:To understand how drug taken affects cholesterol level, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer:
keywords