A:For people who do not speak english, the probability of long lifespan is 67%. For people who speak english, the probability of long lifespan is 35%. B:Will speaking english increase the chance of long lifespan? Answer: costumes
A:Method 1: We look directly at how yupt correlates with muvq in general. Method 2: We look at this correlation case by case according to xyfo. B:To understand how yupt affects muvq, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: algebra
A:For those who are not zuph, the probability of uvzi is 87%. For those who are zuph, the probability of uvzi is 44%. B:Will zuph decrease the chance of uvzi? Answer: algebra
A:Method 1: We look directly at how rixq correlates with xevu in general. Method 2: We look at this correlation case by case according to swoy. B:To understand how rixq affects xevu, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: costumes
A:For patients who are not male and not receiving treatment, the probability of recovery is 97%. For patients who are not male and receiving treatment, the probability of recovery is 67%. For patients who are male and not receiving treatment, the probability of recovery is 41%. For patients who are male and receiving treatment, the probability of recovery is 9%. The overall probability of male gender is 58%. B:For patients receiving treatment, would it be less likely to see recovery if the patient had received no treatment? Answer: costumes
A:We know that gyzp causes jyka. jyka causes hwax. gyzp or hwax causes lirg. We observed an individual is not gyzp. B:Would an individual is not lirg if not jyka instead of jyka? Answer: algebra
A:Method 1: We look directly at how jyka correlates with lirg in general. Method 2: We look at this correlation case by case according to gyzp. B:To understand how jyka affects lirg, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: costumes
A:For children with unintelligent parents and with low parental social status, the probability of being lactose intolerant is 83%. For children with unintelligent parents and with high parental social status, the probability of being lactose intolerant is 46%. For children with intelligent parents and with low parental social status, the probability of being lactose intolerant is 55%. For children with intelligent parents and with high parental social status, the probability of being lactose intolerant is 20%. For children with unintelligent parents and confounder inactive, the probability of high parental social status is 24%. For children with unintelligent parents and confounder active, the probability of high parental social status is 6%. For children with intelligent parents and confounder inactive, the probability of high parental social status is 40%. For children with intelligent parents and confounder active, the probability of high parental social status is 62%. The overall probability of confounder active is 44%. B:If we disregard the mediation effect through parents' social status, would parents' intelligence negatively affect lactose intolerance? Answer: algebra
A:For nonsmokers and with no tar deposit, the probability of lung cancer is 90%. For nonsmokers and with high tar deposit, the probability of lung cancer is 64%. For smokers and with no tar deposit, the probability of lung cancer is 84%. For smokers and with high tar deposit, the probability of lung cancer is 59%. For nonsmokers, the probability of high tar deposit is 70%. For smokers, the probability of high tar deposit is 24%. B:For smokers, would it be less likely to see lung cancer if the person had been a nonsmoker? Answer:
algebra