A:We know that zuph causes wibl. zuph or wibl causes uvzi. B:Would an individual is uvzi if zuph instead of not zuph? Answer: absorption
A:For children with unintelligent parents, the probability of being lactose intolerant is 90%. For children with intelligent parents, the probability of being lactose intolerant is 56%. B:For children with intelligent parents, would it be more likely to see being lactose intolerant if the child had unintelligent parents? Answer: absorption
A:The overall probability of jyka is 20%. For those who are not jyka, the probability of lirg is 95%. For those who are jyka, the probability of lirg is 95%. B:Is lirg more likely than not lirg overall? Answer: absorption
A:For those who are not yomx and are not gwet, the probability of xevu is 12%. For those who are not yomx and are gwet, the probability of xevu is 69%. For those who are yomx and are not gwet, the probability of xevu is 77%. For those who are yomx and are gwet, the probability of xevu is 22%. For those who are not yomx and are not cwoi, the probability of gwet is 99%. For those who are not yomx and are cwoi, the probability of gwet is 2%. For those who are yomx and are not cwoi, the probability of gwet is 65%. For those who are yomx and are cwoi, the probability of gwet is 59%. The overall probability of cwoi is 3%. B:Does yomx positively affect xevu through gwet? Answer: libs
A:For those who are not kwox and are not swoq, the probability of kwoz is 29%. For those who are not kwox and are swoq, the probability of kwoz is 63%. For those who are kwox and are not swoq, the probability of kwoz is 46%. For those who are kwox and are swoq, the probability of kwoz is 71%. For those who are not kwox, the probability of swoq is 57%. For those who are kwox, the probability of swoq is 32%. B:For those who are kwox, would it be more likely to see kwoz if the individual was not kwox? Answer: absorption
A:Method 1: We look directly at how having a brother correlates with disease in general. Method 2: We look at this correlation case by case according to pre-conditions. B:To understand how having a brother affects disease, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: libs
A:The overall probability of jyka is 74%. For those who are not jyka, the probability of lirg is 86%. For those who are jyka, the probability of lirg is 78%. B:Is lirg less likely than not lirg overall? Answer: libs
A:We know that zupj causes yupt. zupj or yupt causes muvq. We observed an individual is zupj. B:Would an individual is not muvq if yupt instead of not yupt? Answer: libs
A:For those who are not xevo and are not tijv, the probability of gyzp is 0%. For those who are not xevo and are tijv, the probability of gyzp is 66%. For those who are xevo and are not tijv, the probability of gyzp is 86%. For those who are xevo and are tijv, the probability of gyzp is 2%. For those who are not xevo, the probability of tijv is 87%. For those who are xevo, the probability of tijv is 83%. B:Does xevo negatively affect gyzp through tijv? Answer:
absorption