A:For those who are not kwox, the probability of kwoz is 34%. For those who are kwox, the probability of kwoz is 51%. B:For those who are kwox, would it be more likely to see kwoz if the individual was not kwox? Answer: zum
A:The overall probability of xevo is 77%. For those who are not xevo, the probability of gyzp is 92%. For those who are xevo, the probability of gyzp is 54%. B:Is gyzp more likely than not gyzp overall? Answer: bondage
A:For those who are not yomx, the probability of xevu is 2%. For those who are yomx, the probability of xevu is 11%. B:For those who are yomx, would it be less likely to see xevu if the individual was not yomx? Answer: bondage
A:The overall probability of rixq is 20%. For those who are not rixq, the probability of xevu is 46%. For those who are rixq, the probability of xevu is 39%. B:Is xevu more likely than not xevu overall? Answer: zum
A:We know that citrus intake causes sufficient vitamin C, and we know that sufficient vitamin C causes no scurvy. B:Would the patient has scurvy if citrus intake instead of absence of citrus? Answer: zum
A:Method 1: We look directly at how yomx correlates with xevu in general. Method 2: We look at this correlation case by case according to gwet. B:To understand how yomx affects xevu, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: bondage
A:Method 1: We look directly at how yupt correlates with muvq in general. Method 2: We look at this correlation case by case according to zupj. B:To understand how yupt affects muvq, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: zum
A:For infants with nonsmoking mothers, the probability of freckles is 47%. For infants with smoking mothers, the probability of freckles is 57%. B:For infants with smoking mothers, would it be less likely to see freckles if the infant had a nonsmoking mother? Answer: bondage
A:We know that yomx causes gwet and not cwoi. gwet or cwoi causes xevu. B:Would an individual is not xevu if yomx instead of not yomx? Answer:
zum