A:For CEOs who fire employees and managers who don't sign termination letters, the probability of large feet is 44%. For CEOs who fire employees and managers who sign termination letters, the probability of large feet is 9%. For CEOs who fire employees and managers who don't sign termination letters, the probability of large feet is 70%. For CEOs who fire employees and managers who sign termination letters, the probability of large feet is 34%. The overall probability of CEO's decision to fire the employee is 83%. B:Will manager signing the termination letter decrease the chance of large feet? Answer: assumes
A:For those who are not hwax, the probability of rukz is 22%. For those who are hwax, the probability of rukz is 23%. For those who are not hwax, the probability of pexu is 51%. For those who are hwax, the probability of pexu is 55%. B:Will pexu decrease the chance of rukz? Answer: definitely
A:We know that vubr or wibl causes zuph. vubr and zuph causes uvzi. We observed an individual is wibl and an individual is vubr. B:Would an individual is uvzi if zuph instead of not zuph? Answer: assumes
A:Method 1: We look at how yupt correlates with muvq case by case according to zupj. Method 2: We look directly at how yupt correlates with muvq in general. B:To understand how yupt affects muvq, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: definitely
A:The overall probability of jyka is 56%. For those who are not jyka, the probability of lirg is 92%. For those who are jyka, the probability of lirg is 39%. B:Is lirg more likely than not lirg overall? Answer: assumes
A:Method 1: We look directly at how yupt correlates with muvq in general. Method 2: We look at this correlation case by case according to xyfo. B:To understand how yupt affects muvq, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: definitely
A:We know that rixq causes not zuph, and we know that zuph causes not xevu. B:Would an individual is xevu if not rixq instead of rixq? Answer: definitely
A:For those who are not kwox and are not swoq, the probability of kwoz is 48%. For those who are not kwox and are swoq, the probability of kwoz is 10%. For those who are kwox and are not swoq, the probability of kwoz is 64%. For those who are kwox and are swoq, the probability of kwoz is 45%. For those who are not kwox and are not muvy, the probability of swoq is 71%. For those who are not kwox and are muvy, the probability of swoq is 71%. For those who are kwox and are not muvy, the probability of swoq is 32%. For those who are kwox and are muvy, the probability of swoq is 83%. The overall probability of muvy is 49%. B:Does kwox positively affect kwoz through swoq? Answer: assumes
A:For those who are not kwox and are not swoq, the probability of kwoz is 16%. For those who are not kwox and are swoq, the probability of kwoz is 13%. For those who are kwox and are not swoq, the probability of kwoz is 35%. For those who are kwox and are swoq, the probability of kwoz is 26%. For those who are not kwox and are not muvy, the probability of swoq is 43%. For those who are not kwox and are muvy, the probability of swoq is 31%. For those who are kwox and are not muvy, the probability of swoq is 78%. For those who are kwox and are muvy, the probability of swoq is 60%. The overall probability of muvy is 78%. B:Does kwox negatively affect kwoz through swoq? Answer:
assumes