A:We know that vubr causes zuph. zuph causes not wibl. vubr or wibl causes uvzi. We observed an individual is vubr. B:Would an individual is not uvzi if not zuph instead of zuph? Answer: edwards
A:For people who do not listen to jazz and nonsmokers, the probability of lung cancer is 36%. For people who do not listen to jazz and smokers, the probability of lung cancer is 73%. For people who listen to jazz and nonsmokers, the probability of lung cancer is 29%. For people who listen to jazz and smokers, the probability of lung cancer is 74%. For people who do not listen to jazz and with low pollution, the probability of smoking is 31%. For people who do not listen to jazz and with high pollution, the probability of smoking is 74%. For people who listen to jazz and with low pollution, the probability of smoking is 65%. For people who listen to jazz and with high pollution, the probability of smoking is 100%. The overall probability of high pollution is 42%. B:If we disregard the mediation effect through smoking, would listening to jazz positively affect lung cancer? Answer: edwards
A:For nonsmokers, the probability of college admission is 49%. For smokers, the probability of college admission is 39%. B:For smokers, would it be less likely to see college admission if the student had been a nonsmoker? Answer: edwards
A:For nonsmokers and with no tar deposit, the probability of being allergic to peanuts is 37%. For nonsmokers and with high tar deposit, the probability of being allergic to peanuts is 81%. For smokers and with no tar deposit, the probability of being allergic to peanuts is 38%. For smokers and with high tar deposit, the probability of being allergic to peanuts is 76%. For nonsmokers, the probability of high tar deposit is 15%. For smokers, the probability of high tar deposit is 67%. B:For smokers, would it be less likely to see being allergic to peanuts if the person had been a nonsmoker? Answer: amended
A:Method 1: We look at how rixq correlates with xevu case by case according to swoy. Method 2: We look directly at how rixq correlates with xevu in general. B:To understand how rixq affects xevu, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: amended
A:We know that yupt causes zupj, and we know that zupj causes muvq. B:Would an individual is not muvq if yupt instead of not yupt? Answer: edwards
A:The overall probability of yupt is 100%. The probability of not yupt and muvq is 0%. The probability of yupt and muvq is 37%. B:Is the chance of muvq smaller when observing yupt? Answer: amended
A:The overall probability of jyka is 90%. For those who are not jyka, the probability of lirg is 31%. For those who are jyka, the probability of lirg is 38%. B:Is lirg less likely than not lirg overall? Answer: amended
A:The overall probability of pexu is 29%. The probability of not pexu and rukz is 38%. The probability of pexu and rukz is 11%. B:Is the chance of rukz smaller when observing pexu? Answer:
amended