A:The overall probability of jyka is 46%. The probability of not jyka and lirg is 27%. The probability of jyka and lirg is 39%. B:Is the chance of lirg larger when observing jyka? Answer: livestock
A:The overall probability of jyka is 18%. For those who are not jyka, the probability of kwox is 48%. For those who are jyka, the probability of kwox is 48%. B:Is kwox less likely than not kwox overall? Answer: livestock
A:For people who do not drink coffee, the probability of dark room is 93%. For people who drink coffee, the probability of dark room is 62%. B:For people who drink coffee, would it be less likely to see dark room if the person did not drink coffee? Answer: wrong
A:For people who do not drink coffee and wives that don't set the alarm, the probability of ringing alarm is 6%. For people who do not drink coffee and wives that set the alarm, the probability of ringing alarm is 50%. For people who drink coffee and wives that don't set the alarm, the probability of ringing alarm is 56%. For people who drink coffee and wives that set the alarm, the probability of ringing alarm is 100%. For people who do not drink coffee, the probability of alarm set by wife is 48%. For people who drink coffee, the probability of alarm set by wife is 79%. B:Does drinking coffee positively affect alarm clock through wife? Answer: livestock
A:The overall probability of yupt is 88%. For those who are not yupt, the probability of muvq is 10%. For those who are yupt, the probability of muvq is 50%. B:Is muvq less likely than not muvq overall? Answer: livestock
A:For children with unintelligent parents and with low parental social status, the probability of being lactose intolerant is 89%. For children with unintelligent parents and with high parental social status, the probability of being lactose intolerant is 86%. For children with intelligent parents and with low parental social status, the probability of being lactose intolerant is 45%. For children with intelligent parents and with high parental social status, the probability of being lactose intolerant is 47%. For children with unintelligent parents and confounder inactive, the probability of high parental social status is 92%. For children with unintelligent parents and confounder active, the probability of high parental social status is 70%. For children with intelligent parents and confounder inactive, the probability of high parental social status is 55%. For children with intelligent parents and confounder active, the probability of high parental social status is 24%. The overall probability of confounder active is 49%. B:If we disregard the mediation effect through parents' social status, would parents' intelligence positively affect lactose intolerance? Answer: wrong
A:For those who are hwax, the correlation between pexu and rukz is -0.14. B:If we look at those who are hwax, does it mean that pexu affects rukz? Answer: wrong
A:Method 1: We look directly at how yupt correlates with muvq in general. Method 2: We look at this correlation case by case according to xyfo. B:To understand how yupt affects muvq, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: wrong
A:For those who are not pexu, the probability of hwax is 43%. For those who are pexu, the probability of hwax is 92%. For those who are not pexu and are not hwax, the probability of rukz is 0%. For those who are not pexu and are hwax, the probability of rukz is 34%. For those who are pexu and are not hwax, the probability of rukz is 1%. For those who are pexu and are hwax, the probability of rukz is 33%. The overall probability of pexu is 17%. B:Will pexu increase the chance of rukz? Answer:
livestock