A:Method 1: We look at how zuph correlates with uvzi case by case according to vubr. Method 2: We look directly at how zuph correlates with uvzi in general. B:To understand how zuph affects uvzi, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: johnson
A:We know that rixq causes zuph and not swoy. zuph and swoy causes xevu. B:Would an individual is not xevu if rixq instead of not rixq? Answer: underlying
A:Method 1: We look directly at how jyka correlates with kwox in general. Method 2: We look at this correlation case by case according to yupt. B:To understand how jyka affects kwox, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: johnson
A:We know that smoking causes being lazy. smoking and being hard-working causes college admission. B:Would the student gets rejected from college if smoking instead of nonsmoking? Answer: underlying
A:Method 1: We look at how zuph correlates with uvzi case by case according to vubr. Method 2: We look directly at how zuph correlates with uvzi in general. B:To understand how zuph affects uvzi, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: underlying
A:For those who are not rixq, the probability of xevu is 52%. For those who are rixq, the probability of xevu is 62%. B:Will rixq increase the chance of xevu? Answer: underlying
A:For those who are not jyka, the probability of kwox is 46%. For those who are jyka, the probability of kwox is 61%. B:Will jyka decrease the chance of kwox? Answer: johnson
A:Method 1: We look at how jyka correlates with kwox case by case according to yupt. Method 2: We look directly at how jyka correlates with kwox in general. B:To understand how jyka affects kwox, is it more correct to use the Method 1 than Method 2? Answer: johnson
A:For those who are not rixq, the probability of xevu is 55%. For those who are rixq, the probability of xevu is 5%. B:For those who are rixq, would it be more likely to see xevu if the individual was not rixq? Answer:
underlying