Skip to content
Branch: master
Find file Copy path
Find file Copy path
Fetching contributors…
Cannot retrieve contributors at this time
133 lines (99 sloc) 5.76 KB

Fitting LDA Models in R

Wouter van Atteveldt & Kasper Welbers November 2019


LDA, which stands for Latent Dirichlet Allocation, is one of the most popular approaches for probabilistic topic modeling. The goal of topic modeling is to automatically assign topics to documents without requiring human supervision. Although the idea of an algorithm figuring out topics might sound close to magical (mostly because people have too high expectations of what these 'topics' are), and the mathematics might be a bit challenging, it is actually really simple fit an LDA topic model in R.

A good first step towards understanding what topic models are and how they can be usefull, is to simply play around with them, so that's what we'll do here. First, let's create a document term matrix from the inaugural speeches in quanteda, at the paragraph level since we can expect these to be mostly about the same topic:

texts = corpus_reshape(data_corpus_inaugural, to = "paragraphs")
dfm = dfm(texts, remove_punct=T, remove=stopwords("english"))
dfm = dfm_trim(dfm, min_docfreq = 5)

To run LDA from a dfm, first convert to the topicmodels format, and then run LDA. Note the useof set.seed(.) to make sure that the analysis is reproducible.

dtm = convert(dfm, to = "topicmodels") 
m = LDA(dtm, method = "Gibbs", k = 10,  control = list(alpha = 0.1))
## A LDA_Gibbs topic model with 10 topics.

Although LDA will figure out the topics, we do need to decide ourselves how many topics we want. Also, there are certain hyperparameters (alpha) that we can tinker with to have some control over the topic distributions. For now, we won't go into details, but do note that we could also have asked for 100 topics, and our results would have been much different.

Inspecting LDA results

We can use terms to look at the top terms per topic:

terms(m, 5)
Topic 1 Topic 2 Topic 3 Topic 4 Topic 5 Topic 6 Topic 7 Topic 8 Topic 9 Topic 10
great upon government us can nations government us world government
years shall people god every peace public let peace shall
states duties states day america war business can freedom congress
now country union president must foreign revenue new people may
upon people every new country united can must free law

The posterior function gives the posterior distribution of words and documents to topics, which can be used to plot a word cloud of terms proportional to their occurrence:

topic = 6
words = posterior(m)$terms[topic, ]
topwords = head(sort(words, decreasing = T), n=50)
##    nations      peace        war    foreign     united     states 
## 0.02084942 0.01905361 0.01779653 0.01582114 0.01564156 0.01312741

Now we can plot these words:

wordcloud(names(topwords), topwords)

We can also look at the topics per document, to find the top documents per topic: = posterior(m)$topics[, topic] = sort(, decreasing=T)
##   1949-Truman.43 1805-Jefferson.3  1901-McKinley.2   1949-Truman.25 
##        0.9181818        0.9093023        0.9050000        0.8882353 
##   1813-Madison.7 1889-Harrison.22 
##        0.8714286        0.8627907

And we can find this document in the original texts by looking up the document id in the document variables docvars:

docs = docvars(dfm)
topdoc = names([1]
docid = which(rownames(docs) == topdoc)
##                                                                                                                                      1949-Truman.43 
## "In addition, we will provide military advice and equipment to free nations which will cooperate with us in the maintenance of peace and security."

Finally, we can see which president prefered which topics:

docs = docs[rownames(docs) %in% rownames(dtm), ]
tpp = aggregate(posterior(m)$topics, by=docs["President"], mean)
rownames(tpp) = tpp$President

As you can see, the topics form a sort of 'block' distribution, with more modern presidents and older presidents using quite different topics. So, either the role of presidents changed, or language use changed, or (probably) both.

To get a better fit of such temporal dynamics, see the session on structural topic models, which allow you to condition topic proportions and/or contents on metadata covariates such as source or date.

Visualizing LDA with LDAvis

LDAvis is a nice interactive visualization of LDA results. It needs the LDA and DTM information in a slightly different format than what's readily available, but you can use the code below to create that format from the lda model m and the dtm:

dtm = dtm[slam::row_sums(dtm) > 0, ]
phi = as.matrix(posterior(m)$terms)
theta <- as.matrix(posterior(m)$topics)
vocab <- colnames(phi)
doc.length = slam::row_sums(dtm)
term.freq = slam::col_sums(dtm)[match(vocab, colnames(dtm))]

json = createJSON(phi = phi, theta = theta, vocab = vocab,
     doc.length = doc.length, term.frequency = term.freq)
You can’t perform that action at this time.