Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

rgw: don't create user on secondary zones #4714

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 17, 2020
Merged

rgw: don't create user on secondary zones #4714

merged 1 commit into from Feb 17, 2020

Conversation

dsavineau
Copy link
Contributor

@dsavineau dsavineau commented Nov 5, 2019 •
edited

The rgw user creation for the Ceph dashboard integration shouldn't be
created on secondary rgw zones.

Closes: #4707
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794351

Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau dsavinea@redhat.com

@dsavineau dsavineau requested a review from guits November 5, 2019 20:34
@dsavineau
Copy link
Contributor Author

jenkins test centos-non_container-switch_to_containers

1 similar comment
@dsavineau
Copy link
Contributor Author

jenkins test centos-non_container-switch_to_containers

@guits
Copy link
Collaborator

guits commented Nov 7, 2019

@dsavineau is there a BZ for this?

@dsavineau
Copy link
Contributor Author

@guits no only a github issue

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Dec 7, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Dec 7, 2019
@guits guits mentioned this pull request Jan 29, 2020
Closed
@dsavineau
rgw: don't create user on secondary zones
3d96c03 
The rgw user creation for the Ceph dashboard integration shouldn't be
created on secondary rgw zones.

Closes: ceph#4707
Closes: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1794351

Signed-off-by: Dimitri Savineau <dsavinea@redhat.com>
@dsavineau
Copy link
Contributor Author

jenkins test centos-container-rgw_multisite

@dsavineau
Copy link
Contributor Author

jenkins test centos-non_container-rgw_multisite

@guits guits added this to the v4.1 milestone Jan 29, 2020
@dsavineau
Copy link
Contributor Author

jenkins test centos-container-all_in_one

@dsavineau
Copy link
Contributor Author

jenkins test centos-non_container-all_in_one

@dsavineau
Copy link
Contributor Author

jenkins test centos-non_container-all_daemons

@dsavineau
Copy link
Contributor Author

jenkins test jenkins test centos-container-all_in_one

1 similar comment
@dsavineau
Copy link
Contributor Author

jenkins test jenkins test centos-container-all_in_one

@dsavineau
Copy link
Contributor Author

jenkins test centos-container-all_in_one

1 similar comment
@dsavineau
Copy link
Contributor Author

jenkins test centos-container-all_in_one

@dsavineau
Copy link
Contributor Author

jenkins test centos-non_container-all_daemons

@dsavineau
Copy link
Contributor Author

We need #5046 first to be able to run the CI

@guits
Copy link
Collaborator

guits commented Feb 17, 2020

jekins test centos-container-rgw_multisite

@guits
Copy link
Collaborator

guits commented Feb 17, 2020

jenkins test centos-container-rgw_multisite

@guits guits merged commit 16e12bf into ceph:master Feb 17, 2020
@mergify mergify bot mentioned this pull request Feb 17, 2020
Merged
@dsavineau dsavineau deleted the issue_4707 branch February 17, 2020 14:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@guits guits guits approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
backport-stable-4.0 bug do-not-close
Projects
None yet
Milestone
v4.1
2 participants
@dsavineau @guits