Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

rgw: remove variable radosgw_num_instances #4858

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

alimaredia
Copy link
Contributor

Change the existing rgw naming conventions to use
the inventory_hostname instead of rgw+{radosgw_num_instance}.

This allows multiple rgws to be declared in the
inventory on the same host but with a different
port.

Signed-off-by: Ali Maredia amaredia@redhat.com

@guits
Copy link
Collaborator

guits commented Dec 12, 2019

@alimaredia I think we have to discuss this before going further

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Jan 11, 2020

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the wontfix label Jan 11, 2020
@alimaredia
Copy link
Contributor Author

unstale

@stale stale bot removed the wontfix label Jan 13, 2020
Change the existing rgw naming conventions to use
the inventory_hostname instead of rgw+{radosgw_num_instance}
when rgw multisite is enabled

This allows multiple rgws to be declared in the
inventory on the same host but with a different
port.

Signed-off-by: Ali Maredia <amaredia@redhat.com>
@alimaredia alimaredia force-pushed the wip-remove-radosgw-num-instances branch from 4ffa061 to a24b21c Compare March 5, 2020 20:43
@dsavineau
Copy link
Contributor

Closing in favor of #5138

@dsavineau dsavineau closed this Mar 13, 2020
@dsavineau dsavineau deleted the wip-remove-radosgw-num-instances branch March 13, 2020 15:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants