New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

qa/objectstore/filestore-btrfs: test btrfs on trusty only #15814

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jun 22, 2017

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@liewegas
Member

liewegas commented Jun 21, 2017

Centos btrfs hits ENOSPC all the time :(, and now xenial is doing
it too.

See http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/20169
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil sage@redhat.com

qa/objectstore/filestore-btrfs: test btrfs on trusty only
Centos btrfs hits ENOSPC all the time :(, and now xenial is doing
it too.

See http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/20169
Signed-off-by: Sage Weil <sage@redhat.com>
@liewegas

This comment has been minimized.

Member

liewegas commented Jun 22, 2017

@yuriw this one has ubuntu instead of centos. look ok?

@liewegas liewegas requested a review from yuriw Jun 22, 2017

@yuriw

@liewegas did you want to say :

os_type: ubuntu
os_version: "16.04"

?

@liewegas

This comment has been minimized.

Member

liewegas commented Jun 22, 2017

Yeah that's what it says now, right? I think an earlier version of the commit was wrong

@yuriw

This comment has been minimized.

Contributor

yuriw commented Jun 22, 2017

@liewegas i see


# centos btrfs hits ENOSPC all the time :(
# xenial too.  so far trusty seems to behave?
os_type: ubuntu
os_version: "14.04"
overrides:
  ceph:
    fs: btrfs
    conf:
      osd:
        osd objectstore: filestore
        osd op thread timeout: 60
@liewegas

This comment has been minimized.

Member

liewegas commented Jun 22, 2017

Oh right, I misread. yes, we want trusty (14.04). xenial and centos both fail with ENOSPC.

@liewegas liewegas merged commit 580c890 into ceph:master Jun 22, 2017

4 checks passed

Signed-off-by all commits in this PR are signed
Details
Unmodified Submodules submodules for project are unmodified
Details
arm64 make check arm64 make check succeeded
Details
make check make check succeeded
Details

@liewegas liewegas deleted the liewegas:wip-everyone-hates-btrfs branch Jun 22, 2017

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment