New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build/ops: ceph / ceph-dbg steal ceph-objecstore-tool from ceph-test / ceph-test-dbg #5069

Merged
1 commit merged into from Jun 26, 2015

Conversation

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@ghost

ghost commented Jun 24, 2015

debian: ceph-dbg steals ceph-objectstore-tool from ceph-test-dbg (tak…
…e 2)

968573b incorrectly backported
6f11fbf. It should instead reflect that
ceph-dbg in 0.94.2 and above will break ceph-test-dbg in all versions
prior to 0.94.2.

In other words, 0.94-XXXX being lower than 0.94.1, upgrading from
0.94.1 to 0.94.2 will not notice that ceph-dbg breaks ceph-test-dbg.

$ dpkg --compare-versions 0.94-XXXX lt 0.94.1 && echo yes || echo no
yes
$ dpkg --compare-versions 0.94.2 lt 0.94.1-xxx && echo yes || echo no
no

http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/11806 Fixes: #11806

Signed-off-by: Loic Dachary <loic@dachary.org>

@ghost ghost self-assigned this Jun 24, 2015

@ghost ghost added this to the hammer milestone Jun 24, 2015

@ghost ghost added bug fix build/ops labels Jun 24, 2015

@ghost

This comment has been minimized.

ghost commented Jun 24, 2015

pushing to gitbuilders

@ktdreyer

This comment has been minimized.

Member

ktdreyer commented Jun 24, 2015

assuming gitbuilder succeeds, Reviewed-by: Ken Dreyer <kdreyer@redhat.com>

@ghost ghost changed the title from ceph / ceph-dbg steal ceph-objecstore-tool from ceph-test / ceph-test-dbg to DNM: ceph / ceph-dbg steal ceph-objecstore-tool from ceph-test / ceph-test-dbg Jun 24, 2015

@ghost

This comment has been minimized.

@ghost

This comment has been minimized.

ghost commented Jun 26, 2015

http://pulpito.ceph.com/loic-2015-06-25_15:49:17-upgrade:hammer-wip-11806-hammer---basic-vps/949226/ failed but only after

2015-06-25T13:07:16.614 INFO:teuthology.orchestra.run.vpm111:Running: u'sudo DEBIAN_FRONTEND=noninteractive apt-get -y --force-yes -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confdef" -o Dpkg::Options::="--force-confold" install librbd1-dbg=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise ceph=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise ceph-test=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise ceph-dbg=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise rbd-fuse=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise librados2-dbg=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise ceph-fuse-dbg=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise libcephfs-jni=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise libcephfs1-dbg=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise radosgw=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise librados2=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise libcephfs1=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise ceph-mds=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise radosgw-dbg=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise librbd1=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise python-ceph=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise ceph-test-dbg=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise ceph-fuse=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise ceph-common=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise libcephfs-java=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise ceph-common-dbg=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise ceph-mds-dbg=0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise'

completed successfully

2015-06-25T13:09:33.909 INFO:teuthology.packaging:The installed version of ceph is 0.94.2-13-g356bd2c-1precise
2015-06-25T13:09:33.909 INFO:teuthology.task.install:The correct ceph version 0.94.2 is installed.

@ghost ghost changed the title from DNM: ceph / ceph-dbg steal ceph-objecstore-tool from ceph-test / ceph-test-dbg to ceph / ceph-dbg steal ceph-objecstore-tool from ceph-test / ceph-test-dbg Jun 26, 2015

ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 26, 2015

Loic Dachary
Merge pull request #5069 from dachary/wip-11806-hammer
ceph / ceph-dbg steal ceph-objecstore-tool from ceph-test / ceph-test-dbg

Reviewed-by: Ken Dreyer <kdreyer@redhat.com>

@ghost ghost merged commit 6f7cd04 into ceph:hammer Jun 26, 2015

@ghost ghost changed the title from ceph / ceph-dbg steal ceph-objecstore-tool from ceph-test / ceph-test-dbg to build/ops: ceph / ceph-dbg steal ceph-objecstore-tool from ceph-test / ceph-test-dbg Aug 4, 2015

This issue was closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment