Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

librados: Change radosgw pools default crush ruleset #5754

Merged
1 commit merged into from Sep 7, 2015

Conversation

Projects
None yet
2 participants
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 2, 2015

librados: Make librados pool_create respect default_crush_ruleset
Make pool_create in librados use the osd_pool_default_crush_replicated_ruleset

Fixes: #11640

Signed-off-by: Yuan Zhou <yuan.zhou@intel.com>
(cherry picked from commit da96a89)

@ghost ghost self-assigned this Sep 2, 2015

@ghost ghost added this to the hammer milestone Sep 2, 2015

@ghost ghost added bug fix core labels Sep 2, 2015

ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 2, 2015

Merge pull request #5754: Change radosgw pools default crush ruleset
Reviewed-by: Loic Dachary <ldachary@redhat.com>
@ghost

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Author

ghost commented Sep 6, 2015

@tchaikov this hammer backport passed a rados suite (see http://tracker.ceph.com/issues/12701#note-62 for the details). Do you think it is ready to be merged ?

@ghost ghost assigned tchaikov and unassigned ghost Sep 6, 2015

@tchaikov

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor

tchaikov commented Sep 7, 2015

👍

@tchaikov tchaikov assigned ghost and unassigned tchaikov Sep 7, 2015

ghost pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 7, 2015

Loic Dachary
Merge pull request #5754 from dachary/wip-12588-hammer
Change radosgw pools default crush ruleset

Reviewed-by: Kefu Chai <kchai@redhat.com>

@ghost ghost merged commit 62f543b into ceph:hammer Sep 7, 2015

@ghost ghost changed the title Change radosgw pools default crush ruleset librados: Change radosgw pools default crush ruleset Sep 13, 2015

This issue was closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
You can’t perform that action at this time.