People are incorrectly configuring Lets Encrypt on their websites. #3159

Closed
belldandu opened this Issue Jun 13, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

Projects
None yet
3 participants

belldandu commented Jun 13, 2016

So yeah.
terminal

Pretty sure this ties into #2026

Mind you this happened when i went to wget Multiverse for my minecraft server (meaning i'm not hosting the server i'm trying to get the files from.)

From what i've read this issue is caused by people using cert.pem instead of fullchain.pem as the publicly available ssl certificate.

And i do not get this issue on my domain and i'm using fullchain.pem which means that people are incorrectly configuring their websites.

If you guys can notify people somehow that they are incorrectly configuring their websites, that would be great.

@belldandu belldandu changed the title from Lets Encrypt CA could not be locally verified on Ubuntu Xenial 16.04 to People are incorrectly configuring Lets Encrypt on their websites. Jun 13, 2016

As of posting this i also notified someone over in the multiverse irc chat about this and they said they would email the owner and link them to this issue.

Contributor

bmw commented Jun 13, 2016

Glad you found a way to get in touch with the owner of the site about getting it fixed.

There's only so much the certbot client can use to solve this issue. Perhaps we can add a subcommand to try and check if things are configured correctly. Unfortunately, due to things like firewall rules, this will never completely work, but it might be useful to some people.

If you meant to report this issue to the Let's Encrypt CA/server about verifying all certificates issued by Let's Encrypt, you should make an issue on the letsencrypt/boulder repo.

@bmw bmw added the feature request label Jun 13, 2016

Owner

pde commented Jun 13, 2016

We already offer this kind of testing in the form of the qualys test links (though perhaps those only apply if you use the run subcommand?). I'd argue that insofar as this is is solvable, it's a duplicate of #1819, which I'm optimistically tagging for 0.9.0.

@pde pde added the duplicate label Jun 13, 2016

@pde pde closed this Jun 13, 2016

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment