Skip to content

HTTPS clone URL

Subversion checkout URL

You can clone with
or
.
Download ZIP

Loading…

SPDY #875

Closed
Borkason opened this Issue · 5 comments

1 participant

@Borkason
Collaborator

Original author: alobbs (October 05, 2011 09:18:32)

It seems that Google's SPDY is slowly attracting some attention from third parties. It would be good if we evaluated whether or not we want to support it.

Original issue: http://code.google.com/p/cherokee/issues/detail?id=1277

@Borkason
Collaborator

From harkemas...@gmail.com on October 09, 2011 19:48:07
Patrick Manus' (network engineer) comment on the current Mozilla Firefox SPDY implementation:
https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/mozilla.dev.tech.network/ZS5MUdCTTCc

@Borkason
Collaborator

From anonsph...@gmail.com on December 04, 2011 12:28:47
SPDY would be really nice as it should be integrated in Firefox within the next three month. => https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=528288#c173

If you compare e. g. google maps on https in Firefox and Chrome you will notice a really huge performance boost and it might reduce requests and with it load.

@Borkason
Collaborator

From Ilya.Veselov on January 28, 2012 11:03:18
SPDY Essentials at Google TechTalks with a brief overview of SPDY advantages over HTTP: http://youtu.be/TNBkxA313kk

@Borkason
Collaborator

From anonsph...@gmail.com on March 26, 2012 12:22:23
Is this accepted now? If you compare at firefox it is a great performance win:

http://spdytest.com/ load time: 3092ms
vs.
https://spdytest.com/ load time: 1476ms

@Borkason
Collaborator

Duplicate of #76

@Borkason Borkason closed this
@Borkason Borkason reopened this
@Borkason Borkason closed this
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.