Skip to content

Removed SVN info from docs #3

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

5 participants

@pigmej
Cherokee Project member
pigmej commented Oct 18, 2011

I removed the SVN infos from docs. I did it on master branch because it's for .101 also.

I also adjusted the infos a little bit. Mostly done from head, but should be ok.

Cheers

@skarcha
Cherokee Project member
skarcha commented Oct 18, 2011

Apart from these comments, I think all is fine. Thanks @pigmej! :-)

@pigmej
Cherokee Project member
pigmej commented Oct 18, 2011

@skarcha fixed ;)

@skarcha
Cherokee Project member
skarcha commented Oct 18, 2011

Ops! I forgot to mention that I think all this changes should be done on "dev", and merged with "master" later.

@pigmej
Cherokee Project member
pigmej commented Oct 18, 2011

@skarcha the problem is that @alobbs already started 102.

@skarcha
Cherokee Project member
skarcha commented Oct 18, 2011

And where is the problem? All commits on "dev" will be merged in "master" when .102 will be launched. Well, this is what I think.. :)

@pigmej
Cherokee Project member
pigmej commented Oct 18, 2011

I think those doc fixes are needed 'asap' because they are currently broken.

@skarcha
Cherokee Project member
skarcha commented Oct 18, 2011

Ahhh! Ok, understood :-)

But if these "docs" are the same used in the web page, don't you think that it should have his own repository? I would not do commits/merges on "master" if it is not for a new version. But well, it's a decision of @alobbs :-)

@pigmej
Cherokee Project member
pigmej commented Oct 18, 2011

well:

(23:34:19) pigmej: alobbs: wouldn't be it cool to have cherokee_doc
(23:34:26) pigmej: as a another repo?
(23:35:39) alobbs: it could be another another repo, yes
(23:36:01) pigmej: I know that it could be ;)
(23:36:05) alobbs: I do not see much of a point on it though :)
(23:36:35) pigmej: well you won't trigger 'updates' of cherokee by changing the documentation:)

Definitelly agree with you @skarcha.

But in current model, I would go to update master even without 'core changes' because of 'broken docs'. And those docs are for .101 also ;-)

@skarcha
Cherokee Project member
skarcha commented Oct 18, 2011

Hahaha! Ok, @alobbs decision... ;)

@skinkie
Cherokee Project member
skinkie commented Oct 19, 2011

Mmm... your download wget... how will that work with a submodule like CTK?

@skarcha
Cherokee Project member
skarcha commented Oct 19, 2011

Good point @skinkie... :-)

@pigmej
Cherokee Project member
pigmej commented Oct 19, 2011

Hmm the problem is that in fact that dev/master TIP doesn't have any submodules (https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/ly9BiNabij1BPJP-OD7_o7_3jZbBmZzajyQXXwWfMxc)

Downloading ZIP/tarball package should contain all submodules when they are present.

@alobbs
Cherokee Project member
alobbs commented Oct 19, 2011

The code has been already merged to 'dev'.

Thank you very much pigmej.
Great job!! :-)

@alobbs alobbs closed this Oct 19, 2011
@ionmx
Cherokee Project member
ionmx commented Oct 19, 2011

:-)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Something went wrong with that request. Please try again.