This repository has been archived by the owner. It is now read-only.

Fix Dependencies #2

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Jul 25, 2017

Conversation

Projects
None yet
3 participants
@genio
Contributor

genio commented Jul 25, 2017

The dependencies in this dist are a bit out of date and some are missing. In particular, Devel::Pragma dropped the on_require function in version 1.000000.

These problems prevent the dist from building/testing. To get around this, a few changes were made:

  • Add a cpanfile for easier management of prereqs.
  • Add a prereq report for testers to aid in debugging.
  • Get rid of usage of Devel::Param::on_require as that was dropped quite some time ago (v1.0.0).
  • Update ppport.h with latest.

Hope that helps.

Add a cpanfile for easier management of prereqs. Add a prereq reporte…
…r for testers to aid in debugging. Get rid of usage of Devel::Param::on_require as that was dropped quite some time ago (v1.0.0). Update ppport with latest.

@chocolateboy chocolateboy merged commit f627471 into chocolateboy:master Jul 25, 2017

@genio genio deleted the genio:fixdeps branch Jul 25, 2017

@chocolateboy

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chocolateboy

chocolateboy Jul 25, 2017

Owner

Thanks!

Are you using this module? I've been planning to remove it from CPAN for a while as it's a pain to maintain, and it only appears to be used by two experimental modules (cc @tobyink).

Owner

chocolateboy commented Jul 25, 2017

Thanks!

Are you using this module? I've been planning to remove it from CPAN for a while as it's a pain to maintain, and it only appears to be used by two experimental modules (cc @tobyink).

@genio

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@genio

genio Jul 25, 2017

Contributor

I'm not, no. I received the module in the Pull Request Challenge for this month. If it's a pain to maintain, maybe deletion or putting it up for adoption would be best (or direct handoff to @tobyink )?

Contributor

genio commented Jul 25, 2017

I'm not, no. I received the module in the Pull Request Challenge for this month. If it's a pain to maintain, maybe deletion or putting it up for adoption would be best (or direct handoff to @tobyink )?

@tobyink

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@tobyink

tobyink Aug 4, 2017

Collaborator

I quite like this module, even if it's still way too experimental for using in stable software. I'd be happy to take over the module if it needs a new maintainer.

Collaborator

tobyink commented Aug 4, 2017

I quite like this module, even if it's still way too experimental for using in stable software. I'd be happy to take over the module if it needs a new maintainer.

@chocolateboy

This comment has been minimized.

Show comment
Hide comment
@chocolateboy

chocolateboy Aug 4, 2017

Owner

Awesome! I've made you a collaborator on this repo (but feel free to fork it and maintain it under your own account), and the primary maintainer on PAUSE.

EDIT Or I can transfer it if you prefer.

Good luck!

Owner

chocolateboy commented Aug 4, 2017

Awesome! I've made you a collaborator on this repo (but feel free to fork it and maintain it under your own account), and the primary maintainer on PAUSE.

EDIT Or I can transfer it if you prefer.

Good luck!

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.