Join GitHub today
GitHub is home to over 20 million developers working together to host and review code, manage projects, and build software together.
Why the project stalled? #8
Comments
|
Sorry ... I missed this note from you. IMO ... its not that Rust is poorly suited, its just that Nim is suited much better. I found Nim to not only satisfy the requirements for writing a kernel (which Rust also does) but also I can actually get how the whole thing works. I attribute it primarily to the fact that it generates "readable" C code as its target. I can elaborate if you are interested. |
mkpankov
commented
Feb 12, 2015
|
Yeah, some details would be nice! I'm considering using a modern language for systems programming and would like an opinion of experienced developer. |
|
From a feature set point of view I believe Rust and Nim are
This link has some more comparison data - You can take a look at the my xv6 source in Nim - I was able to make progress much faster in Nim. |
justgage
commented
Feb 14, 2015
|
Thanks for showing me nim. Didn't even know it existed! |
netroby
commented
Feb 16, 2015
|
It's named nimrod before, a long name , can not easily remember. but now, it named nim. |
mkpankov commentedFeb 6, 2015
Hi,
Sorry to create an issue about this, but I'm very interested in why you decided to abandon Rust for this task and use Nim instead.
Could you please tell us what are the challenges and why Rust is poorly suited to deal with them?