Missing declared license #2658
Merged
Missing declared license #2658
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
You can review the change introduced to the full definition at ClearlyDefined. |
👍 this makes perfect sense |
AE49
approved these changes
Dec 2, 2019
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Type: Missing
Summary:
Missing declared license
Details:
Missing declared
Resolution:
Package states BSD, but which one is never declared. Per this conversation, it looks like it was supposed to Apache but was created incorrectly in the beginning so I am submitting Apache. request/caseless#28
Affected definitions: