fix: inconsistent format between issue list and status

[mingrammer]

Currently, issue list and issue status have different printing formats.

This PR adds the age section for issue list and uses the tablewriter for issue status to keep the format consistency between them.

Current version

Fixed version

[ampinsk]

This looks good to me from a design perspective! @mislav or @vilmibm should take a look code wise 😄

[mislav]

Nice work! Just few little suggestions, plus a request: since this tweaks the output of issue status, could you apply the same improvements to pr status?

Thanks! This looks great ✨

[mingrammer]

PR status has optional checks and review status. Should I make these as table fields? :)

[mislav]

PR status has optional checks and review status.

Hmm that's a good point. Right now it might be tricky to force those into table fields. Please disregard my last comment and hold off porting pr status to table view until we decide what to do here 🤔

[mislav]

This looks good if we just consider issue status output, but I would hold off merging until we figure out whether it's a problem that this makes the output different than pr status, and discuss how could we apply the same formatter there—PR status has more fields, so it might be more complicated to force it to a table layout.

[mingrammer]

Yap. I'm glad that this pr is approved :) I'll be waiting for final decisions.

[ampinsk]

I think since the info and layout of pr status is more complex we shouldn’t force the table layout. So I think this is good to go!