What happened?
As a open source Cline user, I found unclear separation between the open source license and the service terms.
-
Cline project is licensed under Apache 2.0, which:
- Allows commercial use
- Does not require contractual agreements between users and Cline Bot Inc.
- Permits free use and modification of the software
-
However, the Cline Bot Inc.'s Terms of Service updated on February 24th, 2025 that includes VSCode extension (*1) requires users to:
- Accept a contract with Cline Bot Inc.
- At 3.2, grant Cline extensive rights to user content and output, including:
- Irrevocable, perpetual, transferable rights
- Rights to modify and create derivative works
- Rights to use content for business purposes and product development
- Worldwide, royalty-free licensing rights
- Simply, it exposes all data including prompt, source code and responses to Cline Bot Inc (refer 3.1).
This creates a concerning situation where:
- Users expecting Apache 2.0 freedoms are actually required to accept additional terms
- The ToS imposes significant content rights requirements that go beyond the Apache 2.0 scope
Could you please clarify:
- How these licensing terms are meant to coexist?
- Which parts of the project are purely Apache 2.0 vs requiring ToS acceptance?
- Whether the ToS content rights requirements can be reconciled with Apache 2.0's permissive nature?
*1 : Here is the exact part that indicates VSCode extension (Cline OSS?) is included to Terms of Services.
These Terms of Service (these “Terms”) describe the terms and conditions by which you may access and/or use: (a) the Visual Studio Code extension and software development agent provided by Cline Bot Inc. (including its successors and assigns, “Cline,” “we,” “our,” or “us”) that uses frontier models to write, edit, and build software; and (b) the website(s), including cline.bot, and any successor URL(s), and any and all related software, documentation, and online, mobile-enabled, and/or digital services that link to these Terms (collectively, the “Service”).
Steps to reproduce
- Visit https://cline.bot/tos, then finds out the conflict between license on GitHub.
Relevant API REQUEST output
Provider/Model
none
Operating System
none
System Info
none
Cline Version
(This is not Cline Version) but Terms of Service is updated on February 24th, 2025.
Additional context
Security Concerns documentation outlines the architecture designed to maintain data privacy and security but does not address right of data usage. While the secure architecture framework protects data, Cline Bot Inc. reserves the right to request data access (like having a key for house) according to terms of service.
What happened?
As a open source Cline user, I found unclear separation between the open source license and the service terms.
Cline project is licensed under Apache 2.0, which:
However, the Cline Bot Inc.'s Terms of Service updated on February 24th, 2025 that includes VSCode extension (*1) requires users to:
This creates a concerning situation where:
Could you please clarify:
*1 : Here is the exact part that indicates VSCode extension (Cline OSS?) is included to Terms of Services.
Steps to reproduce
Relevant API REQUEST output
Provider/Model
none
Operating System
none
System Info
none
Cline Version
(This is not Cline Version) but Terms of Service is updated on February 24th, 2025.
Additional context
Security Concerns documentation outlines the architecture designed to maintain data privacy and security but does not address right of data usage. While the secure architecture framework protects data, Cline Bot Inc. reserves the right to request data access (like having a key for house) according to terms of service.