Use detected framework names in autoconfig

[ascorbic]

Use the framework.name from build-info rather than the ID or hard-coded name. This means it displays SvelteKit rather than svelte-kit

---

• Tests
  • Tests included
  • Tests not necessary because:
• Public documentation
  • Cloudflare docs PR(s):
  • Documentation not necessary because: not a documented feature
• Wrangler V3 Backport
  • Wrangler PR:
  • Not necessary because: not in v3

[changeset-bot]

🦋 Changeset detected

Latest commit: aafe97c

The changes in this PR will be included in the next version bump.

Not sure what this means? Click here to learn what changesets are.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add another changeset to this PR

[github-actions]

Failed to automatically backport this PR's changes to Wrangler v3. Please manually create a PR targeting the v3-maintenance branch with your changes. Thank you for helping us keep Wrangler v3 supported!

Depending on your changes, running git rebase --onto v3-maintenance main mk/wrangler/autoconfig-name might be a good starting point.

Notes:

• your PR branch should be named v3-backport-11366
• add the skip-v3-pr label to the current PR to stop this workflow from failing

[pkg-pr-new]

create-cloudflare

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/create-cloudflare@11366

@cloudflare/kv-asset-handler

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/kv-asset-handler@11366

miniflare

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/miniflare@11366

@cloudflare/pages-shared

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/pages-shared@11366

@cloudflare/unenv-preset

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/unenv-preset@11366

@cloudflare/vite-plugin

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/vite-plugin@11366

@cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/vitest-pool-workers@11366

@cloudflare/workers-editor-shared

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/workers-editor-shared@11366

@cloudflare/workers-utils

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@cloudflare/workers-utils@11366

wrangler

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/wrangler@11366

commit: aafe97c

[vicb]

switch (id) {...} ?

[ascorbic]

Yeah maybe when we have a few more options but probably not much point now. I didn't change the logic there.

[ascorbic]

I went ahead and changed it, as I was updating the function signature