Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GCF glibc dependencies broken #65

Closed
jberkhahn opened this issue Jan 23, 2014 · 5 comments
Closed

GCF glibc dependencies broken #65

jberkhahn opened this issue Jan 23, 2014 · 5 comments

Comments

@jberkhahn
Copy link
Contributor

There was a recent update that switched an lgpl go yaml parsing library for a cgo based one. This has broken using gcf from within a deployed app as it now requires a newer version of glibc (2.14) than is provided on the default bosh-lite environment.

@cf-gitbot
Copy link
Collaborator

We have created an issue in Pivotal Tracker to manage this. You can view the current status of your issue at: http://www.pivotaltracker.com/story/show/64411220

@maxbrunsfeld
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @jberkhahn,

Thanks for pointing this out! We have updated our linux builds to use Ubuntu 10.04, glibc version 2.11.1. Can you check that the new binaries work for you?

@jberkhahn
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm still getting the same error when I try to run gcf: /lib/libc.so.6: version `GLIBC_2.14' not found (required by gcf)

This is with the 64-bit linux binary pulled from http://go-cli.s3.amazonaws.com/gcf-linux-amd64.tgz, running on bosh lite.

@tedsuo
Copy link

tedsuo commented Jan 28, 2014

@jberkhahn, the gcf binaries are old. We've recently renamed gcf to cf. You should download this: http://go-cli.s3.amazonaws.com/cf-linux-amd64.tgz. Let us know if that one works. Thanks!

@jberkhahn
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tedsuo Ah, didn't see that you guys had moved it to be the mainline version. It works great now.
Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants