Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates #18

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Jun 5, 2013
Merged

Updates #18

merged 3 commits into from Jun 5, 2013

Conversation

willkg
Copy link
Contributor

@willkg willkg commented Jun 5, 2013

This fixes a couple of basic problems I have with tower:

  1. the extraction methods have a module path that's intense--this shortens it significantly
  2. there weren't any configuration or usage docs--this fixes that

r?

This updates the versions in the requirements file, removes unneeded
imports in test files and makes a small change so we don't need
test-utils anymore.
Moving these to the base makes it way easier to configure tower.
For example, instead of this:

    DOMAIN_METHODS = {
        'messages': [
            ('fjord/**.py', 'tower.management.commands.extract.extract_tower_python'),
        ]
    }

we can do this:

    DOMAIN_METHODS = {
        'messages': [
            ('fjord/**.py', 'tower.extract_tower_python'),
        ]
    }

I added an import to tower.management.commands.extract so that older
tower configurations continue to work.
This documents tower. There's probably some things missing, but it'll
make people (aka me) much happier.
@willkg
Copy link
Contributor Author

willkg commented Jun 5, 2013

I just noticed there are two pull requests that have been around for many LDAP password resets.

Please don't let this one languish in pull request purgatory forever. It doesn't change any functionality. It's backwards compatible with existing projects.

Help me tower maintainers. You are my only hope.

* Jinja2 and Jingo
* translate-toolkit

See requirements.txt for details.
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You could have linked to it!

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh... you're right. I'll do another pr for that.

davedash added a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 5, 2013
@davedash davedash merged commit 89e380e into clouserw:master Jun 5, 2013
@clouserw
Copy link
Owner

clouserw commented Jun 5, 2013

davedash merged commit 89e380e into clouserw:master from willkg:updates a minute ago

beat me to it! Thanks

@willkg
Copy link
Contributor Author

willkg commented Jun 5, 2013

Thank you both! I really appreciate the promptness.

Also, hi @davedash! I miss you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants