You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 19, 2021. It is now read-only.
Is this intended behaviour? It's problematic for me when using RequireJS.
define [], ->
class MyClass
If MyClass uses @ then a fat arrow will be required, if it doesn't then it will be considered unnecessary. Since it wasn't required in either case, this makes for some annoying inconsistencies between files.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm not following can you provide an example of both situations?
On Mar 31, 2014 7:25 PM, "Kevin Attfield" notifications@github.com wrote:
Is this intended behaviour? It's problematic for me when using RequireJS.
define [], ->
class MyClass
If MyClass uses @ then a fat arrow will be required, if it doesn't then
it will be considered unnecessary. Since it wasn't required in either case,
this makes for some annoying inconsistencies between files.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/249
.
Maybe this is an issue with how I'm using Coffeescript with Require? The wrapper has nothing to do with the class, so it would be nice if it didn't care about the @.
Is this intended behaviour? It's problematic for me when using RequireJS.
If MyClass uses
@
then a fat arrow will be required, if it doesn't then it will be considered unnecessary. Since it wasn't required in either case, this makes for some annoying inconsistencies between files.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: