New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
GE2/1 geometry #1923
GE2/1 geometry #1923
Conversation
ianna
commented
Dec 27, 2013
- GE2/1 geometry back ported from 70x
- Corrected volume names and selection of pilot GE1/1 geometries
- Bugfix in Heavy borated concrete material to avoid warning from G4
- Extended 2023 scenario changed to use current HCAL for the moment
@davidlange6 Please, take it for the next SLHC release |
+1 |
This pull request is fully signed and it will be integrated in one of the next IBs unless changes or unless it breaks tests. @davidlange6 can you please take care of it? |
@ianna - why the HCAL change? |
@davidlange6 - so that a full SIM-DIGI-RECO chain would work with GEM. There are two other 2023 scenarios: Extended2023HGCal and Extended2023SHCal. None of them is ready for the workflow yet. |
What errors come in with the phase 1 hcal? It was working -----Original Message----- @davidlange6https://github.com/davidlange6 - so that a full SIM-DIGI-RECO chain would work with GEM. There are two other 2023 scenarios: Extended2023HGCal and Extended2023SHCal. None of them is ready for the workflow yet. — |
The 2023 default was set with HGCal. |
@ianna - I see - indeed, I see I was using something w/ be5d as the default for our "2023" tests… Need to change that - but indeed we should keep the 2023 default geometry working. I'll take this and then try to switch the gen-sim-digi-reco relval tests to this geometry On Dec 27, 2013, at 11:51 PM, ianna notifications@github.com wrote:
|
Preliminary validation is presented by @dildick during last Friday meeting: To test GEN-SIM-DIGI step:
|
Please, take #2031 instead. |