Skip to content

Vote on topics for future CNCF Technology Radars #35

Closed

Description

@oicheryl

If you are interested in learning what end users recommend for a cloud native use case, add a comment below or +1 to vote. Examples could be categories from the CNCF Landscape, or industry verticals such as financial services.

Topics will be selected quarterly by the editorial team as the basis for a CNCF Technology Radar.

More information at https://github.com/cncf/enduser-public/blob/master/CNCFTechnologyRadar.pdf

Activity

  1. LawrenceHecht commented on Jun 12, 2020

    @LawrenceHecht

    Cheryl, I've done this type of project before. Here are a few suggestions:

    1. Make sure to have a link to the actual tool/product being evaluated. Make sure to time stamp the assessments.
    2. Review the quarterly assessments at a meeting of CNCF end users. This way, you are not assigning a rating only based on the number of votes a technology initially gets.
    3. Don't compromise on making this an invite-only activity.
  2. LawrenceHecht commented on Jun 12, 2020

    @LawrenceHecht

    And, in response to a tweet from @caniszczyk, I think the results should be made publicly available with the CNCF providing value to its members by only letting its end user community participate in making the ratings. Of course, I don't have insight into the membership sales pitch, so take that idea for what it's worth.

  3. caniszczyk commented on Jun 12, 2020

    @caniszczyk
    Contributor

    @LawrenceHecht

    This is an activity meant for CNCF End Users who are actually running these projects in production and share this information amongst each other in a safe environment where there are no vendors, it's by design we do it this way. It is a membership benefit of becoming an official CNCF End User :)

  4. oicheryl commented on Jun 14, 2020

    @oicheryl
    ContributorAuthor

    @LawrenceHecht I appreciate the comments!

    1.Make sure to have a link to the actual tool/product being evaluated. Make sure to time stamp the assessments.

    +1, it's definitely a point in time exercise.

    Review the quarterly assessments at a meeting of CNCF end users. This way, you are not assigning a rating only based on the number of votes a technology initially gets.

    The CNCF end users review the draft before it is released. Each radar will feature a different set of projects depending on the use case, so each technology will be assessed anew each time.

    Don't compromise on making this an invite-only activity.

    Also +1. I've already had people ask how they can get their project on the radar.

    I think the results should be made publicly available with the CNCF providing value to its members by only letting its end user community participate in making the ratings.

    Some of the end users don't have legal/PR permission to publicly state what they use, hence CNCF can publish only aggregrated and anonymized results.

  5. travis-sobeck commented on Jun 15, 2020

    @travis-sobeck

    I like the content, but PDFs are not a useful output medium for this kind of thing (imho).

  6. oicheryl commented on Jun 16, 2020

    @oicheryl
    ContributorAuthor

    @travis-sobeck you mean the graphic? What don't you like about it?

  7. travis-sobeck commented on Jun 16, 2020

    @travis-sobeck

    @oicheryl The problem with a PDF is that it's not interactive. If I'm looking at a graphic with data points, I want to be able to click on the data points to see the source, think of a Grafana graph (or anything similar). Or at a minimum, a link to a specific line on a spreadsheet/webpage with the data. Which is the problem with a PDF, its just one monolithic thing. I want to send a link to someone else to a specific piece of info, not the whole monolithic thing.
    Lastly, a pdf of a spreadsheet is again not interactive. Give people read access to the anonymized data, even if its just json/csv or google spreadsheet.

  8. oicheryl commented on Jun 16, 2020

    @oicheryl
    ContributorAuthor

    @travis-sobeck Got it, I'd absolutely love to make it more interactive. As the very first tech radar it's intentionally a bare bones MVP, but we can add all sorts of bells and whistles over time.

    I really want to make this a useful resource for the wider community, so very happy to get the feedback and improve!

  9. travis-sobeck commented on Jun 16, 2020

    @travis-sobeck

    @oicheryl Yeah, that's fair.

  10. povilasv commented on Jun 20, 2020

    @povilasv

    I would be interested to know what end users recommend for monitoring solutions :)

  11. gadinaor commented on Jun 22, 2020

    @gadinaor

    @oicheryl very nice and useful initiative

    Would be great to see this for:

    • Security
    • Monitoring
  12. KellyGriffin commented on Jun 22, 2020

    @KellyGriffin

    Great insight and very useful.

    Voting for future ideas:

    • Security
    • Monitoring / Visbility
  13. jcwinchell commented on Jun 24, 2020

    @jcwinchell

    Love the concept! Flux was buried in my long list of things to check out and this moved it up towards the top.
    I'd like to see radars for:

    • security
    • service mesh
  14. oicheryl commented on Jun 24, 2020

    @oicheryl
    ContributorAuthor

    @povilasv @gadinaor @KellyGriffin @jcwinchell I've noted your votes - please keep them coming!

  15. cpretzer commented on Jun 26, 2020

    @cpretzer

    +1 for:

    • Service Mesh
    • Observability (Monitoring, Visibility, and the like)
  16. 32 remaining items

  17. oicheryl commented on Aug 20, 2020

    @oicheryl
    ContributorAuthor

    @mischapedia Zalando's tech radar was one of the original inspirations! We are building a new interactive portal which will include more information about the projects and the data behind the radar. Stay tuned...

  18. tomkerkhove commented on Sep 18, 2020

    @tomkerkhove

    Autoscaling

  19. itsLucario commented on Sep 22, 2020

    @itsLucario
    • Service Mesh
    • Monitoring
    • Security
  20. Smana commented on Oct 2, 2020

    @Smana

    Developer productivity ?

  21. joseadanof commented on Oct 3, 2020

    @joseadanof

    Security & Compliance

  22. o6uoq commented on Oct 7, 2020

    @o6uoq

    It would be great to see the CNCF Technology Radar cover the left-to-right, from developer to production environment, all modern, commodity and specialist tooling inspired by the CNCF Landscape:

    What this looks like in practice from the top of my head as a very much a lean pipeline:

    • VCS (GitHub, GitLab, etc)
    • CI/CD Tooling (Jenkins, GitHub, GitLab)
    • CI/CD Integrations (open source projects which support and implement testing frameworks, developer/code security, etc)
    • Orchestration (Docker, Serverless, K8s, etc)
    • CSP (Cloud Service Providers e.g. AWS, GCP, Azure)
    • Codification (HashiCorp/Terraform/Ansible/et al.)

    ..and much more (like most of the above in this thread).

  23. thschue commented on Dec 1, 2020

    @thschue

    We (App Delivery) would find it useful to have a Technology Radar covering Operators (as we are currently working on a Whitepaper), so e.g. which frameworks end-users are using and wich problems they solve/face using operators.

  24. kgamanji commented on Jan 8, 2021

    @kgamanji

    Latest proposed topics by the tech radar team:

    • Security and secret management
    • On-prem cluster management
    • Governance and compliance
    • Storage and persistent volumes
    • Cost management and optimization
  25. caniszczyk commented on Jan 8, 2021

    @caniszczyk
    Contributor
  26. kgamanji commented on Jan 8, 2021

    @kgamanji

    Awesome, anything on service mesh? :o?
    …
    On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 10:44 AM Katie Gamanji @.***> wrote: Latest proposed topics by the tech radar team: - Security and secret management - On-prem cluster management - Governance and compliance - Storage and persistent volumes - Cost management and optimization — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#35 (comment)>, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAAPSIKHQFNZH4DMX2ABK53SY4Y75ANCNFSM4N4JUKMQ .
    -- Cheers, Chris Aniszczyk http://aniszczyk.org +1 512 961 6719

    Nothing on service mesh this time, but maybe the future tech radar teams will choose it as a topic :)

  27. xmulligan commented on May 5, 2021

    @xmulligan

    I know services meshes are a hot topic, but cloud native penguins would also love to see one on fishing meshes

  28. rootsongjc commented on May 6, 2021

    @rootsongjc
    Member

    Looking forward to seeing the Sevice Mesh Radar.

  29. jhanos commented on Jun 25, 2022

    @jhanos

    Service Mesh Radar could be interesting

  30. onlydole commented on Jun 26, 2023

    @onlydole
    Member

    Closing this issue with a new process and Radar being brainstormed (more information coming in 2023 Q3).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

      Milestone

      No milestone

      Relationships

      None yet

      Development

      No branches or pull requests

      Issue actions