Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add charter for CNCF Storage SIG. #234

Merged
merged 3 commits into from May 22, 2019

Conversation

quinton-hoole
Copy link
Contributor

@quinton-hoole quinton-hoole commented May 6, 2019

cc @xiang90 @caniszczyk

On Tue, 30 Apr 2019, 13:07 "Li, Xiang, x.li@alibaba-inc.com wrote:
I worked with the Storage WG to create the initial SIG Storage Charter. We now have a draft. We hope to form the SIG before May 20 so that we can announce it at Kubecon.


# Areas Considered In Scope

Storage systems and approaches suitable for and commonly used in
Copy link
Contributor

@lizrice lizrice May 7, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I feel like there is a verb or two missing here - doing what with storage systems and approaches? Given the next paragraph maybe it is as simple as "understanding", but maybe also "documenting"?

Copy link
Contributor Author

@quinton-hoole quinton-hoole May 9, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed, will add a verb.

Copy link
Contributor

@lizrice lizrice May 14, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry to be picky @quinton-hoole I would feel more comfortable with casting my vote if we had something to resolve this comment (especially as it could be used as a model charter for other SIGs).

Copy link
Contributor Author

@quinton-hoole quinton-hoole May 14, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@lizrice No problem. I've added a verb to make it a proper sentence. The verbless phrase also grated my grammar education sensibilities :-)

To avoid duplicating what's already in the next paragraph, and the mission statement section, I just added "are considered in scope".


# Interfaces With Other Related Groups

* **Kubernetes Storage SIG** - is focussed towards
Copy link
Contributor

@lizrice lizrice May 7, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nit: would be nice to have links to the other groups here to help avoid confusion

Copy link
Contributor Author

@quinton-hoole quinton-hoole May 9, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed, will add.

Projects.

# Current CNCF Storage Projects

Copy link
Contributor

@lizrice lizrice May 7, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do we expect this list of projects to be updated over time, or is this a snapshot? I am worrying about the maintainability of this list, plus also the list here

Copy link
Contributor Author

@quinton-hoole quinton-hoole May 9, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Agreed. We need to decide where the canonical mapping from CNCF projects to
CNCF SIGs lives. I'll leave it here for now, but we can move it to a
consolidated location once that has been decided.

@xiang90
Copy link
Contributor

xiang90 commented May 7, 2019

@lizrice @quinton-hoole SIG Security created its own repo and put the charter and other stuff there. https://github.com/cncf/sig-security Should we do the same thing here?

@quinton-hoole
Copy link
Contributor Author

quinton-hoole commented May 7, 2019

@quinton-hoole
Copy link
Contributor Author

quinton-hoole commented May 9, 2019

Given the shortage of time, I suggest we get the final charter into this repo, and move it to the new one as soon as that's been set up properly.

@xiang90
Copy link
Contributor

xiang90 commented May 10, 2019

@caniszczyk It seems that @quinton-hoole has addressed all comments. How shall we get this Charter approved? Start a vote process?


**[Proposed] Co-Chairs:** Alex Chircop, Quinton Hoole, “One Other TBD”

**[Proposed] Tech Leads:** Saad Ali, Xing Yang, “One Other TBD”
Copy link
Contributor

@chira001 chira001 May 13, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add Sugu Sougoumarane as Tech Lead

Copy link
Member

@ultrasaurus ultrasaurus May 16, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you please remove [Proposed] -- when merged, that will ratify the co-chairs, right? unless you plan on separate process for finalizing chairs :)

Copy link
Contributor

@chira001 chira001 May 16, 2019

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes - once the vote is complete, we will remove the [Proposed]

@caniszczyk
Copy link
Contributor

caniszczyk commented May 14, 2019

TOC vote kicked off for CNCF Storage SIG: https://lists.cncf.io/g/cncf-toc/message/3247

@caniszczyk caniszczyk merged commit f1f8f54 into cncf:master May 22, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

6 participants