You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The current implementation is geared toward ease-of-use much more than scalability, so I'm afraid there isn't currently a great workaround. At the moment, the best way is to cluster your dataset from the top down and run DeBaCl on each cell of the partition.
Thanks for the reply . I figured DeBaCI clustering quality is better than HDBSCAN , and easier to manage , but just memory and time to process are the bottleneck .
I did testing for 389 images with 400k 128 dimensions sift key points features .
It took over 10gb ram and used 15gb swap memory , eventually my ssd was out of storage and process went dead without error information .
I reduced to half of images with 200k 128 dimensions sift key points features . Same thing happened .
is there any solution I can fix it ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: