Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: Add testNetworking.testBondActive #8736

Conversation

mvollmer
Copy link
Member

@mvollmer mvollmer commented Mar 1, 2018

NetworkManager 1.10 has a regression here, so let's test this
explicitly.

testBondingMain also hits the regression, but because the active
interface has "manual" ipv4 settings, and Cockpit copies those to the
bond, the bond ends up looking okay although it doesn't really work.

testBond also hits the regression, but because it has one inactive
interface, the bond ends up being functional (with just one slave).

Fixes #8735

NetworkManager 1.10 has a regression here, so let's test this
explicitly.

testBondingMain also hits the regression, but because the active
interface has "manual" ipv4 settings, and Cockpit copies those to the
bond, the bond ends up looking okay although it doesn't really work.

testBond also hits the regression, but because it has one inactive
interface, the bond ends up being functional (with just one slave).

Fixes cockpit-project#8735
@mvollmer
Copy link
Member Author

mvollmer commented Mar 1, 2018

The new test will fail on some images. Let's see where.

@mvollmer
Copy link
Member Author

mvollmer commented Mar 1, 2018

Test fails on rhel-7-5, fedora-27, fedora-atomic, fedora-i386, debian-testing, and ubuntu-stable. Ubuntu-stabe is a surprise.

@martinpitt
Copy link
Member

@mvollmer: None of our images have network-manager 1.10 yet. They all are at 1.8. 1.10 is in current Ubuntu devel and Fedora 28. Maybe the regression already is in 1.8 then?

@mvollmer
Copy link
Member Author

mvollmer commented Mar 5, 2018

rhel-7-5 has NetworkManager-1.10.2-12.el7.x86_64, but the regression might well be in 1.8. Or in a config file. I am hoping that the NM people can tell us the details in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1548265

@mvollmer
Copy link
Member Author

mvollmer commented Mar 5, 2018

I am trying out a workaround in #8769.

@mvollmer
Copy link
Member Author

mvollmer commented Mar 7, 2018

Lets only have the workaround PR, and include the new tests there.

@mvollmer mvollmer closed this Mar 7, 2018
@mvollmer
Copy link
Member Author

mvollmer commented Mar 7, 2018

[failure in] Ubuntu-stabe is a surprise.

ubuntu-stable has some version >= 1.8.2, so it also fits into the picture.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants