Skip to content

Conversation

@tbg
Copy link
Member

@tbg tbg commented Oct 31, 2025

Backport 1/1 commits from #156616 on behalf of @tbg.


The recently added logging showed that n2 and n3 just weren't even considered
for starting the rangefeed. Likely this was because the descriptors weren't
gossiped yet (this was corroborated by gossip logging).

Rather than waiting for specific preconditions that "likely" fix
the problem for the particular version of the code, widen the scope
of the retry loop to re-establish the rangefeed until it does get
scheduled were it needs to for the test to succeed.

Closes #156341.

Epic: none


Release justification:

The recently added logging showed that n2 and n3 just weren't even considered
for starting the rangefeed. Likely this was because the descriptors weren't
gossiped yet (this was corroborated by gossip logging).

Rather than waiting for specific preconditions that "likely" fix
the problem for the particular version of the code, widen the scope
of the retry loop to re-establish the rangefeed until it does get
scheduled were it needs to for the test to succeed.

Epic: none
@tbg tbg requested a review from a team as a code owner October 31, 2025 16:21
@tbg tbg force-pushed the blathers/backport-release-25.4-156616 branch from a770e97 to 04b3812 Compare October 31, 2025 16:21
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot. labels Oct 31, 2025
@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot requested a review from stevendanna October 31, 2025 16:21
@blathers-crl
Copy link

blathers-crl bot commented Oct 31, 2025

Thanks for opening a backport.

Before merging, please confirm that the change does not break backwards compatibility and otherwise complies with the backport policy. Include a brief release justification in the PR description explaining why the backport is appropriate. All backports must be reviewed by the TL for the owning area. While the stricter LTS policy does not yet apply, please exercise judgment and consider gating non-critical changes behind a disabled-by-default feature flag when appropriate.

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added backport Label PR's that are backports to older release branches T-kv KV Team labels Oct 31, 2025
@cockroach-teamcity
Copy link
Member

This change is Reviewable

@blathers-crl blathers-crl bot added the backport-test-only Used to denote the backport has only non-production changes label Oct 31, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot merged commit 692cf64 into cockroachdb:release-25.4 Nov 1, 2025
14 of 15 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

backport Label PR's that are backports to older release branches backport-test-only Used to denote the backport has only non-production changes blathers-backport This is a backport that Blathers created automatically. O-robot Originated from a bot. T-kv KV Team target-release-25.4.1

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants