Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support specified anisotropy direction for silk material #12376

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2022

Conversation

jk20012001
Copy link
Contributor

@jk20012001 jk20012001 commented Aug 9, 2022

Re: #

Changelog

  • support specified anisotropy direction for silk material

Continuous Integration

This pull request:

  • needs automatic test cases check.

    Manual trigger with @cocos-robot run test cases afterward.

  • does not change any runtime related code or build configuration

    If any reviewer thinks the CI checks are needed, please uncheck this option, then close and reopen the issue.


Compatibility Check

This pull request:

  • changes public API, and have ensured backward compatibility with deprecated features.
  • affects platform compatibility, e.g. system version, browser version, platform sdk version, platform toolchain, language version, hardware compatibility etc.
  • affects file structure of the build package or build configuration which requires user project upgrade.
  • introduces breaking changes, please list all changes, affected features and the scope of violation.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2022

Interface Check Report

This pull request does not change any public interfaces !

@jk20012001 jk20012001 merged commit e351249 into cocos:v3.6.1 Aug 9, 2022
mmyduckx added a commit to mmyduckx/engine that referenced this pull request Aug 9, 2022
mmyduckx added a commit to mmyduckx/engine that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
mmyduckx added a commit to mmyduckx/engine that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2022
jk20012001 added a commit to jk20012001/engine that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants