From c81eb53350c41f226288097f0c0d5ea2d14e94e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Orge <151183684+DanielOrge@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2025 10:11:32 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Update can-i-bypass-codacy-status-check.md

---
 docs/faq/code-analysis/can-i-bypass-codacy-status-check.md | 3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/docs/faq/code-analysis/can-i-bypass-codacy-status-check.md b/docs/faq/code-analysis/can-i-bypass-codacy-status-check.md
index 380df7bc2a..f65fcb5495 100644
--- a/docs/faq/code-analysis/can-i-bypass-codacy-status-check.md
+++ b/docs/faq/code-analysis/can-i-bypass-codacy-status-check.md
@@ -1,7 +1,6 @@
 # Can I bypass Codacy status check?
 
-!!! Note
-  **This will only apply to gates enforcing quality checks.** If coverage is blocking a pull request analysis, we recommend contacting your git provider admin or temporarily disabling the coverage gate on the repo and reanalyzing the pull request before enabling them again.
+!!! Note **This will only apply to gates enforcing quality checks.** If coverage is blocking a pull request analysis, we recommend contacting your git provider admin or temporarily disabling the coverage gate on the repo and reanalyzing the pull request before enabling them again.
 
 To protect your code from unwelcome changes, you can [configure your Git workflow to block merging pull requests](../../getting-started/integrating-codacy-with-your-git-workflow.md#blocking-pull-requests) if they don't pass the Codacy status check.