-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 198
Reduce members loaded on new event #2413
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
gnclmorais
merged 3 commits into
codebar:master
from
gnclmorais:reduce-members-loaded-on-new-event
Dec 8, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gnclmorais my Rails is so rusty, could you explain why we needed to define the :admin, and :organiser scopes here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One reason for having scopes named like this is that it enables the creation of a very legible manager scope:
scope :manager, -> { admin.or(organiser).distinct }reads quite clearly.The
manager?method seems to have a fast-pathis_admin?first, before querying the more-expensive has_role? call.Looks nice.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The main reason was pointed out by Olle: by defining the scopes, we create building blocks that can be reused anywhere and, most importantly for this PR, allows us to express in a clear way that a manager is either an admin or an organiser.
The
manager?method came from moving the code that was onapp/controllers/application_controller.rbto a more suitable place (i.e. it should be theMembermodel to own thes_admin? || has_role?(:organiser, :any)code).Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gnclmorais I think I asked my question wrong. I wanted to know where the :admin and organiser scopes were being called but I went back and re-read the :manager scope definition and answered my own question, I didn't read it closely enough and couldn't see where they were called. Thanks for the update.