Matthew Brush
codebrainz

Organizations

@geany
Aug 29, 2016
codebrainz commented on issue geany/geany#1195
@codebrainz

I have edited the description to remove references about GObject interfaces as well as the Draconian contribution strategy. For the latter, I just …

Aug 28, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany-plugins#481
@codebrainz

Not sure if it's useful, but Scintilla has a double-click notification.

Aug 28, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany#1187
@codebrainz

@kugel- sorry for hijacking the comments here, we should probably move unrelated discussion to the mailing list.

Aug 28, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany#1187
@codebrainz

Well, it depends if you want to implement the symbol tree all by yourself or not. If not, you'll either have to map libclang symbols to TMTags or …

Aug 28, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany#1187
@codebrainz

keep TM on all the time and use it for symbol tree and tag definition goto These two things are trivial to do, and quite a bit better from plugin…

Aug 27, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany#1187
@codebrainz

Cool, that's a good thing. It might be useful to document that here even if it's not unique to this function. Also s/subordenates/subordinates/ or …

Aug 27, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany#1187
@codebrainz

Is scope just a single name or is it some kind of delimited string (ex. mynamespace/myclass/myinnerclass/myfield) ?

Aug 27, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request universal-ctags/ctags#1089
@codebrainz

Wouldn't it be reasonable to assume that someone checking out from Git either has (or can install) the tool, or if not, that file just won't be gen…

Aug 27, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany#1187
@codebrainz

I'd be surprised if this interface worked well for the libclang backend - I expect its output is something in principle similar to XML DOM tree an…

Aug 26, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany#1193
@codebrainz

Might be nice to see if the plugin dev wants to add the plugin to G-P and help them with it, or at least reference it from the "third party" secti…

Aug 26, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany#1193
@codebrainz

Too bad it couldn't be called .github.editorconfig to avoid the confusion. IMO, if it doesn't have to be disted, and is just for dev tools, why not…

Aug 26, 2016
codebrainz commented on issue geany/geany#1195
@codebrainz

If someone knows the Github Markdown syntax to make the checkboxes I put work, please fix the markup :)

Aug 26, 2016
@codebrainz
Geany Filetype Plugins
Aug 26, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany#1187
@codebrainz

Also, TM is no fallback. It's simply what we've got to manage our tags. I meant after filetype-plugins providing proper per-language support are …

Aug 26, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany#1187
@codebrainz

Wouldn't it be possible to feed the symbol information (e.g. from llvm) to TM (and extend TM to do what's necessary)? It surely would be possible…

Aug 26, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany#1188
@codebrainz

It has annoying downsides like the need to setup a complete "project" with build options and all -- goodbye "build system is enough". It's almost…

Aug 25, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany#1187
@codebrainz

What do you want to achieve with the flags alone? You still need params to say to which name/scope/lang/type/whatever to filter for. It was more …

Aug 25, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany#1187
@codebrainz

Both suggestions aren't type-safe and not compatible to GI. I don't see why we should start playing tricks with type-unsafe functions now? Well the

Aug 25, 2016
codebrainz commented on issue geany/geany#1179
@codebrainz

You should install it somewhere, even if it's just somewhere under the build directory. Personally I use /opt/geany for random testing builds of Ge…

Aug 25, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany#1187
@codebrainz

This is not extensible at all, so not a good fit for a plugin API Then stick a ... as the last parameter, infinitely extensible :) An actual sens…

Aug 25, 2016
codebrainz commented on issue geany/geany#1192
@codebrainz

It would indeed make more sense to stop and nag where it started than at the end of the file.

Aug 25, 2016
codebrainz commented on issue geany/geany#1192
@codebrainz

Any thoughts on making Find the default? Or even better, just wrap around the search without asking. All it needs is some visual indication that …

Aug 25, 2016
codebrainz commented on issue geany/geany#1179
@codebrainz

@Akronix did you install Geany somewhere or are you trying to run it from the source dir? Also you can just create that settings.ini file if it doe…

Aug 24, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany#1190
@codebrainz

If there's important details the user must know about the implementation, we could add them to the manual, or even if really important, to the butt…

Aug 24, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany#1190
@codebrainz

I don't understand. I mean if the "Rename" button in the "Save As" dialog still results in the current document contents being written to the new f…

Aug 24, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany#1190
@codebrainz

1) it no longer renames, thats stupid, please read my #1180 rant for why. If it no longer performs a rename (that is, gives a file a new name), t…

Aug 24, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request geany/geany#1190
@codebrainz

I have not reviewed the internal semantic change yet and don't much care, as long as it still lets me give my files a new name (and never leaves me…

Aug 24, 2016
codebrainz commented on issue geany/geany#1151
@codebrainz

I presume @artem-check means "When will the fix in geany/geany-plugins#473 be available in Ubuntu?" ... if so, I would defer the question to @hyperair

Aug 24, 2016
codebrainz commented on pull request universal-ctags/ctags#1089
@codebrainz

This might not be portable to non-GNU make. I'm not sure of the exact portable syntax for suffix rules with Automake and these complicated extensio…